What professional recommendation can a judge (non-engineer) give in an engineering dispute when these are totally different fields? Shouldn't engineering disputes be settled by engineers only? Legally trained people do not bring anything to the table in an engineering dispute. Engineering is a specialised field which takes years to master in both the training and worldly experience and the idea that a legally trained person can just come into the dispute and resolve it within a few hours or days is not the right way to do things don't you think? The building blocks for engineering are maths, science and engineering drawing which people in the legal fraternity hardly understand.
