This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Mission Possible, a platform to help industries make the transition to net-zero greenhouse gas emissions by 2050.

Former Community Member
Former Community Member
The climate challenges facing the planet transcend national boundaries, requiring urgent action from policy-makers, businesses, organizations and communities to speed up the transition to a net-zero future.
Mission Possible
  • Interesting video with a lot of future work and aspirational language. What doesn't seem to be available is a roadmap, realistic timeline or cost estimate of how to decarbonise the economy of one country, let alone expand it worldwide in 30 years. Looks like a good sales pitch, but is it raising expectations unrealistically as to what can be achieved in a 30 year timeframe, at a cost which can be met/accepted by consumers and tax payers.

  • Former Community Member
    0 Former Community Member
    So in UK:
    https://www.theccc.org.uk/
    More;
    https://www.cibse.org/news-and-policy/november-2019/build2perform-live-day-one-actions-to-meet-uk-s-e








  • Looked at a couple of the links. Lots of political aspirations and statements about what's needed, but little in the way of definitive plans, timelines or costs. 


  • Former Community Member
    0 Former Community Member
    Please compare these two data:
    True Wisdom the firstReal Madness the second!
    https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/science/earth-day-saving-the-planet-may-cost-usd-100-billion-per-year/articleshow/68991339.cms?from=mdr
    https://www.defensenews.com/global/2019/04/28/heres-how-much-global-military-spending-rose-in-2018/

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_military_expenditures




  • Former Community Member
    0 Former Community Member
    So in France!...

    New French public buildings must be made 50% from wood



    The government of France is set to require that all new public buildings must be made at least 50% from wood or other sustainable materials from 2022 as it pushes for sustainable urban development.
    http://www.globalconstructionreview.com/news/new-french-public-buildings-must-be-made-50-wood/

     




  • If you step back and look at what these articles advocate, beyond the environmental aims, they are about taking control of land, limiting consumer choice and lifestyle, and control of consumption. These implications need to be made transparent to consumers particularly in democracies, so they can evaluate the sacrifices they must make to enable delivery and are therefore informed when they vote. 

    To deliver on mission possible, there should be project execution plan(s) based on deliverable technologies, schedule(s) and cost estimate(s) potentially by decarbonising sector with identified contingencies.  


    An interesting read on the challenge for the UK  is Sustainable Energy  without the hot air, by David JC MacKay (2009), available free at www.withouthotair.com.
  • Former Community Member
    0 Former Community Member
    Thank you  for your  indication about the book, that for intellectual honesty I'm posting in this thread. But first I would ask you what is following: If a doctor would say you to quit smoking otherwise you'll die by lungs cancer, you'll cease smoking or continue along this route because you are not willing to do any sacrifices to change this bad style of life and to regain so your full health and to continue living?
    http://www.inference.org.uk/sustainable/book/tex/sewtha.pdf

    Meditate, people, meditate!


  • Thank you for posting the link to the book by Sir David John Cameron MacKay   (22 April 1967 – 14 April 2016) a British physicist and academic. He was the Professor of Engineering at the University of Cambridge and from 2009 to 2014 was Chief Scientific Adviser to the UK Department of Energy and Climate Change (DECC). The book outlines the numerical analysis of moving to zero emissions as well as the cultural and societal challenges. Well worth a read to gain perspective. 


    I'm afraid I found your analogy a bit polarising and binary, being more of the view that compromises and adaptation will be needed to achieve an effective future energy system while maintaining broad consumer and voter support, in a democratic framework.
  • Former Community Member
    0 Former Community Member
    There is no doubt about your latest assertion : " compromises and adaptation will be needed to achieve an effective future energy system while maintaining broad consumer and voter support, in a democratic framework." but I firmly rely on the continuous Science and Technology progress: by 2035-50 in a way or another this world will be quite different-for the good or the evil-this is the real dilemma!

    Where to find the big money for the good change? THE MILITARY! No doubt! But perhaps this is pure utopia!

    One thing is surely certain: on the above dates I won't be here  to verify the then reality of things since I am now a (retired Electrical and Electronics Engineer) almost 72 years old!...
  • Former Community Member
    0 Former Community Member
    A very good point of view!
    https://www.theengineer.co.uk/viewpoint-prof-martin-rees-on-engineering-an-extinction-solution/