This discussion is locked.
You cannot post a reply to this discussion. If you have a question start a new discussion

Don’t touch

Covid 19 has devastated the economy so perhaps in the interest of assisting in the mitigation of any similar reoccurrence, it might be prudent to consider minimising the the need to touch items to get them to function. This has been underway for quite some time where, for example, in heavily trafficked areas such as airports, faucets are electronically controlled. Maybe now is the time to regulate. I have been involved with design of licensed premises such as hotels and pubs for over 30 years. Budgets are often loosened for aesthetics and tightened for the functional side. Rarely would a design for automatic taps get client approval although it would do if they were mandatory. How daft is it to go to the expense of such items and then require a visitor to the toilets to pull a door handle to effect an exit?

it is good to see automatic operation of lighting becoming commonplace, probably due to building regulation requirements but I am sure that there are many other things that we could do to reduce the need to touch things to get them to work.
Parents
  • Expect a lot of very badly designed down to cost electronics, and strange EMC problems though. If there are to be regulations they need to be backed up by a requirement for emissions and immunity testing that would allow co-siting - it is not that long ago that I was being told about  a case in some very expensive London refurbishment where the taps ran whenever the automatic lights came on - the two systems shared a mains DB and the impulse from the lighting inrush was enough to dip the mains for a few microseconds, fooling the tap sensor electronics into registering hands in front when there were none.

    The other related consideration is to make sure it fails safely when it goes wrong - if after a thunderstorm you cannot stop the loos flushing, or the reverse and all your water gets off for every  power cut, then it is going to be quite fun.

    It is not at all insurmountable to have robust systems, rigorous testing and provision for a manual bypass of course,  but that adds to the cost,  and there is more to it than some makers of prefab kit seem to realise - look at the difficulty of getting proof of EMC compliance testing out of manufacturers of car chargers, and then imagine what it would be like for more complex systems, and the quality of some plumber's electrics is odd enough as it is.
Reply
  • Expect a lot of very badly designed down to cost electronics, and strange EMC problems though. If there are to be regulations they need to be backed up by a requirement for emissions and immunity testing that would allow co-siting - it is not that long ago that I was being told about  a case in some very expensive London refurbishment where the taps ran whenever the automatic lights came on - the two systems shared a mains DB and the impulse from the lighting inrush was enough to dip the mains for a few microseconds, fooling the tap sensor electronics into registering hands in front when there were none.

    The other related consideration is to make sure it fails safely when it goes wrong - if after a thunderstorm you cannot stop the loos flushing, or the reverse and all your water gets off for every  power cut, then it is going to be quite fun.

    It is not at all insurmountable to have robust systems, rigorous testing and provision for a manual bypass of course,  but that adds to the cost,  and there is more to it than some makers of prefab kit seem to realise - look at the difficulty of getting proof of EMC compliance testing out of manufacturers of car chargers, and then imagine what it would be like for more complex systems, and the quality of some plumber's electrics is odd enough as it is.
Children
No Data