This discussion is locked.
You cannot post a reply to this discussion. If you have a question start a new discussion

COVID-19: International Response - what has worked?

Former Community Member
Former Community Member
In addition to collating ideas on the UK's engineering and technological response to COVID-19 we are keen to learn from the rest of the world's experiences in this fight so far.

As an organisation with members across the globe we are perfectly placed to tap into your knowledge and insights to guide our Governments actions so this is a call for you to share your experiences and case studies of the engineering and technological interventions that have been tired globally

 
  • What do you think has worked elsewhere?

  • What has been tried and made an impact?

  • What is being trialed currently in your country?

Additionally, if you would like to volunteer your expertise to the Government's response to COVID-19 please email SEP@theiet.org
Parents
  • Social distancing is necessary to limit the infection rate, but in urban areas people are finding there is not enough space to pass one another at a safe distance.


    This, combined with essential workers trying to get to work without using public transport (a possible infection risk), quieter roads under lockdown, and the prospect of gridlock if we emerge from lockdown without safe alternatives to public transport other than private cars, provides an argument for providing more space for people to walk, exercise, and cycle to work in urban areas.


    Temporary infrastructure is being constructed in New Zealand, Paris, Berlin, Budapest, and New York (from only a quick search online - there are probably more), and such measures bring additional benefits, to: help people get fit (building an ability to fight the virus if someone catches it); limit the spread of infection (travelling in the open air with the ability to keep apart from others); if lanes are wide enough they can give emergency services a route through gridlocked traffic (its easier for people walking running and cycling to move to one side than it is for motor vehicles), and in the long term to allow us to achieve carbon targets and health ambitions.


    The engineering community could help facilitate in building this form of resilience into urban areas by reallocating road space and help make some good of a dire global situation.
Reply
  • Social distancing is necessary to limit the infection rate, but in urban areas people are finding there is not enough space to pass one another at a safe distance.


    This, combined with essential workers trying to get to work without using public transport (a possible infection risk), quieter roads under lockdown, and the prospect of gridlock if we emerge from lockdown without safe alternatives to public transport other than private cars, provides an argument for providing more space for people to walk, exercise, and cycle to work in urban areas.


    Temporary infrastructure is being constructed in New Zealand, Paris, Berlin, Budapest, and New York (from only a quick search online - there are probably more), and such measures bring additional benefits, to: help people get fit (building an ability to fight the virus if someone catches it); limit the spread of infection (travelling in the open air with the ability to keep apart from others); if lanes are wide enough they can give emergency services a route through gridlocked traffic (its easier for people walking running and cycling to move to one side than it is for motor vehicles), and in the long term to allow us to achieve carbon targets and health ambitions.


    The engineering community could help facilitate in building this form of resilience into urban areas by reallocating road space and help make some good of a dire global situation.
Children
No Data