This discussion is locked.
You cannot post a reply to this discussion. If you have a question start a new discussion

Are there lessons we could all learn from how the modern military copes with unexpected situations?

Hi,


A couple of serious issues I was involved with this weekend made me think of this. One was in the engineering world to do with the day job, I was reviewing a very serious incident report (fortunately no fatalities but very close) involving a mixture of everyone trying to do the best they could, but perhaps over reliant on structured checklists which had completely missed an entire piece of equipment in a fairly unique situation. The other was a medical issue in the family, once again all the individual hospital staff were doing their best, but there was a bit of the process that just didn't cope with a particular situation.


Which made me think of something that's long been at the back of my mind: I've never worked in a military environment, but my impression of the modern military from the contacts I have had is that there is still a very structured hierarchy, chain of command, and focus on process, but equally it appears that somehow there is also the ability for small units to have the skills and freedom to evaluate and make their own decisions when challenging circumstances arise - exactly the key skills that were missing in the two examples above. 


So really two questions I'd really like to know other people's views on (particularly those who have worked across both the military and civilian worlds): firstly are my impressions above correct? And if so (or even if a bit wrong but on the right lines) are there lessons we can learn from how this works that we can apply to the management of engineering activities in the wider world - particularly in safety critical issues where we need structure but also need the ability to rapidly and effectively cope with new problems when they come up?   


Thanks,


Andy
Parents
  • I think the example I gave more closely aligned with Andy's idea that we don't capture every real world situation rather than a failure in systems thinking. Even knowing what had happened it took us time to work out how a failure on an item of equipment only connected to the 6.6KV distribution caused the failure of the LV system but not the HV system. (I won't go into it here but if you want to discuss over a beer sometime it is quite interesting).


    I think it is an interesting comment from Andy about people who "follow the rules precisely". I have seen this also where people have followed what appear to be sensible decisions but when viewed as part of the overall situation they should have done something else entirely. (The one I am thinking of here I am also willing to discuss over a second beer.... yet again a failure that nobody was able to predict and took a couple of days to identify).


    I can follow Maurice's thoughts but I think that too much of this comes down to the personalities and politics of the workplace. The idea of providing the bigger picture is one that I would always want to follow, but too often I have seen managers who want to control what is going on beneath them and opt for the first scenario.
Reply
  • I think the example I gave more closely aligned with Andy's idea that we don't capture every real world situation rather than a failure in systems thinking. Even knowing what had happened it took us time to work out how a failure on an item of equipment only connected to the 6.6KV distribution caused the failure of the LV system but not the HV system. (I won't go into it here but if you want to discuss over a beer sometime it is quite interesting).


    I think it is an interesting comment from Andy about people who "follow the rules precisely". I have seen this also where people have followed what appear to be sensible decisions but when viewed as part of the overall situation they should have done something else entirely. (The one I am thinking of here I am also willing to discuss over a second beer.... yet again a failure that nobody was able to predict and took a couple of days to identify).


    I can follow Maurice's thoughts but I think that too much of this comes down to the personalities and politics of the workplace. The idea of providing the bigger picture is one that I would always want to follow, but too often I have seen managers who want to control what is going on beneath them and opt for the first scenario.
Children
No Data