Rules and Guidelines
Want to participate in the discussions? Please read our Community Rules and Guidelines. Need some help? Visit Support and Answers.

  • State Not Answered
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 26 replies
  • Subscribers 9 subscribers
  • Views 941 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
You may also be interested in
This discussion is locked.
You cannot post a reply to this discussion. If you have a question start a new discussion

Energy and Climate paper - renewables, fossil, nuclear, hydro - the issues of dstribution

psychicwarrior
An interesting [long] read: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/18/4839/htm


You might care to not read the opinion below (or the article). Sorry for the noise if so.


Opinion: I've always thought that #goinggreen was just an unacceptable 'cash cow' for vested interests to get rich on the back of poorly thought out political driven policies lacking in scientific rigour. If the 'planet is going to burn' without reducing fossil and moving to renewable, then anything 'we' do ought to be not for profit and for the world arguably.  PM Johnson's latest [and foolish?] bet on wind turbines (with all it's current and eventual revalations) and generally the pushing at all costs of  unfriendly battery EV and other tech (there must be better even if there are other challenges to over come) is just set to continue the ever increasing cost on the public purse for arguably little gain and more worryingly more 'damage' and for generations. It doesnt help when I recently read that there are surreptitious plans being considered to allow power gens. to turn off consumer power as and when they see fit  e.g. when it is likely many will be charging their EV cars  [rolls eyes in dismay].  They will do this by enforcing 3rd gen smart meters 'properly' connected up to allow this to happen.  If the current political nonsense and propoganda we have witnessed over the last 8 months or so relating to health, gets a hold in climate change (and how to address it and it probably already has) then perhaps the game is already up.


Rhetorically: Is nuclear the best bet for the planet at the moment (especially if ever they can crack clean[er] fusion). There are challenges to HFC based tech, but as it stands for EV and local power cell, it appeals more to me if the brilliant minds can sort it out. Is battery EV tech going to cripple us on many fronts. Can the UK grid cope. Wind turbines and solar come with so many ifs and buts they should not be relied on. Is this post in the wrong forum ! (apologies if it is - still the link above is related).


Best regards. Habs



Parents
  • 0
    Opinion again: On one aspect, hydrogen cells, it is true there is a lot of 'scientific propoganda' (ha!) as to it's current unsuitibility. Well, I dont mind being a [perhaps poor] conspiracy theorist at times, as conspiracy is only a conspiracy until it isnt  (one cant prove God does not exist, just as one cant prove God does.. etc, though some argue.  I digress), so for me there are huge attractions to HFC tech and therefore there will be vested interests to stop that happening or simply lesser interest, unless power control and profit is in it (part of the unfortunate human flaw perhaps).  So lets adopt the obnoxious unfriendly battery EV and related tech, the wind turbine with limited lifetime blades and most likely then to landfill, the gross amounts of public money commited for these expensive options in vain hope, in the interim, instead of going at the best we can (whatever that is), or are those all we can muster.  Any way, line 100 'clever' folk up and there will be a split opinion on the best way to proceed. To succeed, it would appear the world has to pool its resources and come together with its great minds with input from all sides to get the best plan. That's a tough ask.


    I stand down.


    Now then, where was that twin and earth I was looking for.  All the best folks. :-)
Reply
  • 0
    Opinion again: On one aspect, hydrogen cells, it is true there is a lot of 'scientific propoganda' (ha!) as to it's current unsuitibility. Well, I dont mind being a [perhaps poor] conspiracy theorist at times, as conspiracy is only a conspiracy until it isnt  (one cant prove God does not exist, just as one cant prove God does.. etc, though some argue.  I digress), so for me there are huge attractions to HFC tech and therefore there will be vested interests to stop that happening or simply lesser interest, unless power control and profit is in it (part of the unfortunate human flaw perhaps).  So lets adopt the obnoxious unfriendly battery EV and related tech, the wind turbine with limited lifetime blades and most likely then to landfill, the gross amounts of public money commited for these expensive options in vain hope, in the interim, instead of going at the best we can (whatever that is), or are those all we can muster.  Any way, line 100 'clever' folk up and there will be a split opinion on the best way to proceed. To succeed, it would appear the world has to pool its resources and come together with its great minds with input from all sides to get the best plan. That's a tough ask.


    I stand down.


    Now then, where was that twin and earth I was looking for.  All the best folks. :-)
Children
No Data

Join us to get the best from IET EngX.

Joining EngX lets you personalise your experience so you stay up to date on the topics that interest you, plus you’ll be able to make connections who are looking to collaborate, exchange ideas and more.

Join us Not now

Community Rules & Guidelines