This discussion is locked.
You cannot post a reply to this discussion. If you have a question start a new discussion

Energy and Climate paper - renewables, fossil, nuclear, hydro - the issues of dstribution

An interesting [long] read: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/18/4839/htm


You might care to not read the opinion below (or the article). Sorry for the noise if so.


Opinion: I've always thought that #goinggreen was just an unacceptable 'cash cow' for vested interests to get rich on the back of poorly thought out political driven policies lacking in scientific rigour. If the 'planet is going to burn' without reducing fossil and moving to renewable, then anything 'we' do ought to be not for profit and for the world arguably.  PM Johnson's latest [and foolish?] bet on wind turbines (with all it's current and eventual revalations) and generally the pushing at all costs of  unfriendly battery EV and other tech (there must be better even if there are other challenges to over come) is just set to continue the ever increasing cost on the public purse for arguably little gain and more worryingly more 'damage' and for generations. It doesnt help when I recently read that there are surreptitious plans being considered to allow power gens. to turn off consumer power as and when they see fit  e.g. when it is likely many will be charging their EV cars  [rolls eyes in dismay].  They will do this by enforcing 3rd gen smart meters 'properly' connected up to allow this to happen.  If the current political nonsense and propoganda we have witnessed over the last 8 months or so relating to health, gets a hold in climate change (and how to address it and it probably already has) then perhaps the game is already up.


Rhetorically: Is nuclear the best bet for the planet at the moment (especially if ever they can crack clean[er] fusion). There are challenges to HFC based tech, but as it stands for EV and local power cell, it appeals more to me if the brilliant minds can sort it out. Is battery EV tech going to cripple us on many fronts. Can the UK grid cope. Wind turbines and solar come with so many ifs and buts they should not be relied on. Is this post in the wrong forum ! (apologies if it is - still the link above is related).


Best regards. Habs



Parents
  • The problem OMS is that we are not really looking at small modular reactors. and the H&S boys are doing their best to make them impossible. Rolls Royce are doing some work I hear, and the nuclear subs prove that they are both very safe and practical. However, I can hear the fuss now if I put one on some spare land near my house, even if I paid for it myself. There would be a level of shouting which would make BLM look like a picnic. Large normal reactors are the way to go, but time is against us. Perhaps we should start an IET reactor group to push them forward?
Reply
  • The problem OMS is that we are not really looking at small modular reactors. and the H&S boys are doing their best to make them impossible. Rolls Royce are doing some work I hear, and the nuclear subs prove that they are both very safe and practical. However, I can hear the fuss now if I put one on some spare land near my house, even if I paid for it myself. There would be a level of shouting which would make BLM look like a picnic. Large normal reactors are the way to go, but time is against us. Perhaps we should start an IET reactor group to push them forward?
Children
No Data