This discussion is locked.
You cannot post a reply to this discussion. If you have a question start a new discussion

Free Speech on US Social Media Firms and the Future of the USD

Former Community Member
Former Community Member
To curtail the 'Freedom of Speech' of a Sitting President, just goes on to show the great financial and economic risk that some social media firms operate with, and the subsequent bogus financial value that it is allocated for some reasons - other than a market evaluated and risk assessed fundamental. If social media firms, start subjugating a Sitting President, it is obviously above the laws itself - making it a void when analysing for any financial worth.


The trillion dollar social media market becomes clearly a hype - rather than a reality for the US market and calculated on the US Dollar. A possible reason for the further deterioration of the USD in the world markets!

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2021-01-09/donald-trump-twitter-account-permanently-suspend-capital-riot/13044570

Parents
  • Dear James Shaw and Syamantak Saha,

    Let me understand correctly:

    In the name of free-speech, a President of a Country, sworn to protect its citizen, sows distrust amongst its population by provides lies which are thrown out by 60 different courts, causes insurrection leading to death of 5 citizens, two of whom were defending the Capitol - the highest Government building representing the country is OK and need to be protected whereas a democratic country can burn? Bravo - Hitler/Franco/Mussolini/Putin/Kim/Xi/... would be proud of you! So the free-speech should allow destroy a country, to support and create racial violence, to denigrate women, etc. etc.? Trump and all alt-rightist would also be proud of you.


    James, the stock market price of Facebook dropped due to the new privacy notice of its subsidiary company WhatsApp to share personal data with Facebook leading to literally millions the world over moving to another app called Signal - nothing to do with temporarily banning Trump to stop further destruction of the country where he is supposed to guard its democracy! Let us be clear - a sitting President of a leading democratic country attempted coup d'etat (insurrection) and destroy democracy. He would have joined the above mentioned leaders of other countries.


    Freedom of one man ends when it impinges on freedom of other and attempts to subjugate the other.
Reply
  • Dear James Shaw and Syamantak Saha,

    Let me understand correctly:

    In the name of free-speech, a President of a Country, sworn to protect its citizen, sows distrust amongst its population by provides lies which are thrown out by 60 different courts, causes insurrection leading to death of 5 citizens, two of whom were defending the Capitol - the highest Government building representing the country is OK and need to be protected whereas a democratic country can burn? Bravo - Hitler/Franco/Mussolini/Putin/Kim/Xi/... would be proud of you! So the free-speech should allow destroy a country, to support and create racial violence, to denigrate women, etc. etc.? Trump and all alt-rightist would also be proud of you.


    James, the stock market price of Facebook dropped due to the new privacy notice of its subsidiary company WhatsApp to share personal data with Facebook leading to literally millions the world over moving to another app called Signal - nothing to do with temporarily banning Trump to stop further destruction of the country where he is supposed to guard its democracy! Let us be clear - a sitting President of a leading democratic country attempted coup d'etat (insurrection) and destroy democracy. He would have joined the above mentioned leaders of other countries.


    Freedom of one man ends when it impinges on freedom of other and attempts to subjugate the other.
Children
No Data