Rules and Guidelines
Want to participate in the discussions? Please read our Community Rules and Guidelines. Need some help? Visit Support and Answers.

  • State Not Answered
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 2 replies
  • Subscribers 15 subscribers
  • Views 409 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
You may also be interested in
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

NEW fifth force that needs to be added to the standard model of the universe

CliveS
BBC1 news report at 6pm reported that scientists are looking to find a fifth force to balance the universe.

This new Fifth Force is almost certainly the Magnoflux Spin Effect Force which is about 6 times stronger than gravity..



The new force that spins galaxy stars around blackholes and planets around stars is a magnetic spin force as BBC report this evening identifies the force predicted by Magnoflux hypothesis a decade ago. #nasa #energy #bbcnews #scienceandtechnology

Galaxy effect.pngelecballogic1.jpg


and for solar system

elecballogic1.jpg
Parents
  • 0
    Not really. The gyromagnetic ratio and the anomolous  magnetic moment for the muon has been re-measured, and found to differ from the standard model prediction by a modest amount - which is certainly interesting, and backs up previous "odd" results that have been steadily accumulating over the last 20 years or more, so it is not exactly news, except that the experimental uncertainties are low enough that the chances of it being just due to an error are becoming vanishingly small.


    However, I'd be even more interested in how, and when,  the magnoflux hypotheses predicted these exact numbers with such certainty, or indeed what it predicts for muon g factor at all.

    The magnetic g value is always a bit more than the Dirac value of 2.0 ,  due to QED hence the name of the experiment g-2 (gee minus two) to look at the residual. explanation of muon residual on wikipedia


    The anomolous term 'a' is (g-2)/2  so the 2 numbers are linked.

     

    The accepted theoretical values for the muon are:

    g-factor: 2.00233183620(86)

    anomalous magnetic moment: 0.00116591810(43)

    [uncertainty in parentheses]



    The new experimental world-average results announced by the Muon g-2 collaboration today are:

    g-factor: 2.00233184122(82)

    anomalous magnetic moment: 0.00116592061(41)




    regards Mike.
Reply
  • 0
    Not really. The gyromagnetic ratio and the anomolous  magnetic moment for the muon has been re-measured, and found to differ from the standard model prediction by a modest amount - which is certainly interesting, and backs up previous "odd" results that have been steadily accumulating over the last 20 years or more, so it is not exactly news, except that the experimental uncertainties are low enough that the chances of it being just due to an error are becoming vanishingly small.


    However, I'd be even more interested in how, and when,  the magnoflux hypotheses predicted these exact numbers with such certainty, or indeed what it predicts for muon g factor at all.

    The magnetic g value is always a bit more than the Dirac value of 2.0 ,  due to QED hence the name of the experiment g-2 (gee minus two) to look at the residual. explanation of muon residual on wikipedia


    The anomolous term 'a' is (g-2)/2  so the 2 numbers are linked.

     

    The accepted theoretical values for the muon are:

    g-factor: 2.00233183620(86)

    anomalous magnetic moment: 0.00116591810(43)

    [uncertainty in parentheses]



    The new experimental world-average results announced by the Muon g-2 collaboration today are:

    g-factor: 2.00233184122(82)

    anomalous magnetic moment: 0.00116592061(41)




    regards Mike.
Children
No Data

Community Rules & Guidelines