Rules and Guidelines
Want to participate in the discussions? Please read our Community Rules and Guidelines. Need some help? Visit Support and Answers.

  • State Not Answered
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 24 replies
  • Subscribers 15 subscribers
  • Views 2422 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
You may also be interested in
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

What is net zero and why is it necessary?

Former Community Member
Former Community Member
Decarbonising quickly and effectively to hit our net-zero target by 2050 requires urgent, clear and decisive leadership. Our short video looks at the skills requirements for delivering this target and breaks down the results from our recent Skills for net zero and a green recovery survey. Watch the video and sign in to let us know your thoughts in the comments!

 
sds



Parents
  • 0
    Roger Bryant:
    Would it be better to extend the timescales to 2100?

     


    No, it wouldn't.  That would only encourage people to do less, more slowly.


    If the target is beyond the life expectancy of anyone in a decision-making position, then they have no incentive to do anything meaningful.


Reply
  • 0
    Roger Bryant:
    Would it be better to extend the timescales to 2100?

     


    No, it wouldn't.  That would only encourage people to do less, more slowly.


    If the target is beyond the life expectancy of anyone in a decision-making position, then they have no incentive to do anything meaningful.


Children
No Data

Community Rules & Guidelines