This discussion is locked.
You cannot post a reply to this discussion. If you have a question start a new discussion

How do we make Smart Motorways safer?

Former Community Member
Former Community Member

Smart Motorways bring significant benefits, as they have been designed and implemented to address recurrent congestion on heavily used sections of motorways. We submitted a response to the Transport Select Committee on the roll-out and safety of smart motorways.


Our view is that firstly, safety can be improved by reducing the number of times vehicles stop on motorways and then improving how they are detected, and other drivers then warned and instructed, as illustrated in this diagram. 

72ba677680cffc513876a145d8a88a22-huge-ssd4011-smart-motorways-infographic-v4.jpg
Smart Motorways Infographic.pdf


In order to achieve this we believe that the Government should:



  • Think users: through more training and increasing vehicle roadworthiness.

  • Make use of what is there already: using sat nav for in-vehicle messaging and services such as Waze, to alert drivers.

  • Safeguard the future: through learning lessons from other transport modes.


We have also written a blog on this topic with more information: How do we make Smart Motorways safer?


We are interested in your thoughts on making Smart Motorways more safe, our proposed solutions, or if there is anything that we've missed. Please log in to your IET Community account to share your comments.


Parents
  • I commented earlier and came back to see any new contributions, it has a tiny number of comments so I guess its just not seen by anyone.


    It concerns me that the IET will lend some credibility to what is a ridiculous scheme, that no amount of technology that could be implemented in the short term can fix.

    People will die.

    Your comment:

    "In order to achieve this we believe that the Government should:
    • Think users: through more training and increasing vehicle roadworthiness.

    • Make use of what is there already: using sat nav for in-vehicle messaging and services such as Waze, to alert drivers.

    • Safeguard the future: through learning lessons from other transport modes."

    None of this will make any difference, and the IET is likely to be quoted in the daily press by Shapps as supporting the project.

    If you cant bring yourselves to file a critical assessment it is better that you do not respond at all.

    You should take note that the Commanders of two of the Police Forces in the North have fiercely criticised it.
Reply
  • I commented earlier and came back to see any new contributions, it has a tiny number of comments so I guess its just not seen by anyone.


    It concerns me that the IET will lend some credibility to what is a ridiculous scheme, that no amount of technology that could be implemented in the short term can fix.

    People will die.

    Your comment:

    "In order to achieve this we believe that the Government should:
    • Think users: through more training and increasing vehicle roadworthiness.

    • Make use of what is there already: using sat nav for in-vehicle messaging and services such as Waze, to alert drivers.

    • Safeguard the future: through learning lessons from other transport modes."

    None of this will make any difference, and the IET is likely to be quoted in the daily press by Shapps as supporting the project.

    If you cant bring yourselves to file a critical assessment it is better that you do not respond at all.

    You should take note that the Commanders of two of the Police Forces in the North have fiercely criticised it.
Children
No Data