This discussion is locked.
You cannot post a reply to this discussion. If you have a question start a new discussion

Coal Generation G7.

Many old coal mines had their own electrical generators. They were self sufficient and had a good reliable supply for essential equipment like ventilation fans, water pumps, winder winch, lifting gear and coal cutters etc.  In the U.K. in about 1950 colliery generating plants were shut down and the supplies were obtained from the Electricity Boards. This was a bit of a shame really, as unmarketable grades of coal could be used at the colliery generating plants' boilers.


Now Old King Coal is an enemy it appears.

G7 to agree tough measures on burning coal to tackle climate change - BBC News


Z.
Parents
  • davezawadi (David Stone):

    The most interesting graph you will ever see is the Muna Loa CO2 level. During the "Pandemic" where fossil fuel usage is down 20% at least, there is absolutely no variation in the increasing CO2 level. Even if the UK did what Boris wants we only produce about 1.5% of world CO2, our stopping would therefore make zero difference. Of course, more rational reading of the graph says that the CO2 level is not what does anything, and it does not come from fossil fuels. Looking back a few years, (well quite a lot) CO2 levels were much bigger sometimes, much smaller at others, but nothing bad happened! Proved, the Global Warming (oops should have said climate change as cooling is actually happening at the moment) is not manmade and we can do nothing about it. G7, useless talking shop, nothing will happen.


    Sigh. Where to begin?

    Why have you put pandemic in quotation marks?

    Do you have citation for the 20% drop?

    So we only produce 1.5% of CO2? But we only have 1% of the world population. I only consume 0.000000000000001% of the world's packaging. I guess I should just start chucking my litter on the street.

    We know well how much of atmospheric CO2 comes from fossil fuels due to isotope analysis. Short answer is it mostly comes from fossil fuels.

    Looking back over the last million years or so, CO2 levels have been in the range 180-280 ppm roughly, apart from the last 200 years where they've suddenly shot up to over 400 ppm. In the much longer term of course they've varied much more widely as has the earth's orbit etc.


    You may of course be right and climate scientists may be completely wrong, but personally I'd take their opinions more seriously over what I'd read on wattsup.

     


Reply
  • davezawadi (David Stone):

    The most interesting graph you will ever see is the Muna Loa CO2 level. During the "Pandemic" where fossil fuel usage is down 20% at least, there is absolutely no variation in the increasing CO2 level. Even if the UK did what Boris wants we only produce about 1.5% of world CO2, our stopping would therefore make zero difference. Of course, more rational reading of the graph says that the CO2 level is not what does anything, and it does not come from fossil fuels. Looking back a few years, (well quite a lot) CO2 levels were much bigger sometimes, much smaller at others, but nothing bad happened! Proved, the Global Warming (oops should have said climate change as cooling is actually happening at the moment) is not manmade and we can do nothing about it. G7, useless talking shop, nothing will happen.


    Sigh. Where to begin?

    Why have you put pandemic in quotation marks?

    Do you have citation for the 20% drop?

    So we only produce 1.5% of CO2? But we only have 1% of the world population. I only consume 0.000000000000001% of the world's packaging. I guess I should just start chucking my litter on the street.

    We know well how much of atmospheric CO2 comes from fossil fuels due to isotope analysis. Short answer is it mostly comes from fossil fuels.

    Looking back over the last million years or so, CO2 levels have been in the range 180-280 ppm roughly, apart from the last 200 years where they've suddenly shot up to over 400 ppm. In the much longer term of course they've varied much more widely as has the earth's orbit etc.


    You may of course be right and climate scientists may be completely wrong, but personally I'd take their opinions more seriously over what I'd read on wattsup.

     


Children
No Data