Rules and Guidelines
Want to participate in the discussions? Please read our Community Rules and Guidelines. Need some help? Visit Support and Answers.

  • State Not Answered
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 167 replies
  • Subscribers 14 subscribers
  • Views 10061 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
You may also be interested in
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

I hope the Climate Activists are proud of the effect their lies are having on the younger generation

Roger B

If this survey is real the messages these young people are receiving are completely wrong.

We need to reduce our impact on our planet but CO2 is a complete red herring. The current ECS (temperature increase for a doubling of CO2 in the atmosphere) is centred around 3°C (IPCC AR6). The 2°C will destroy civilisation is simply made up.

 

 

Parents
  • 0

    Peter Bernard Ladkin: 
     

     

    but it will not change the likelihood that the Earth is probably entering one of its 10,000 year climate change cycles. 

    What is that likelihood? What is your reasoning?

    There is a by-now measureable anthropogenic contribution to phenomena which make the biosphere warmer. Even supposing the biosphere is in a warming cycle (as I take it you suppose), which may well affect humanity in various deleterious ways, is there any argument for continuing to contribute to making it worse?

     

     

    ‘What is that likelihood? What is your reasoning?’

    Inter-glacial warmings are known to be cyclical, usually 10000 to 15000 years, Ours is 11000 years, so we can expect cooling at any time from now. This knowledge is gained form Antarctica Ice Core samples.

    An argument to stop the Green agenda, maybe that if we persist with all out Net Zero then economies will fail with unforeseen consequences for the poorest people on the planet.

     

Reply
  • 0

    Peter Bernard Ladkin: 
     

     

    but it will not change the likelihood that the Earth is probably entering one of its 10,000 year climate change cycles. 

    What is that likelihood? What is your reasoning?

    There is a by-now measureable anthropogenic contribution to phenomena which make the biosphere warmer. Even supposing the biosphere is in a warming cycle (as I take it you suppose), which may well affect humanity in various deleterious ways, is there any argument for continuing to contribute to making it worse?

     

     

    ‘What is that likelihood? What is your reasoning?’

    Inter-glacial warmings are known to be cyclical, usually 10000 to 15000 years, Ours is 11000 years, so we can expect cooling at any time from now. This knowledge is gained form Antarctica Ice Core samples.

    An argument to stop the Green agenda, maybe that if we persist with all out Net Zero then economies will fail with unforeseen consequences for the poorest people on the planet.

     

Children
No Data

Community Rules & Guidelines