Rules and Guidelines
Want to participate in the discussions? Please read our Community Rules and Guidelines. Need some help? Visit Support and Answers.

  • State Not Answered
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 167 replies
  • Subscribers 14 subscribers
  • Views 10061 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
You may also be interested in
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

I hope the Climate Activists are proud of the effect their lies are having on the younger generation

Roger B

If this survey is real the messages these young people are receiving are completely wrong.

We need to reduce our impact on our planet but CO2 is a complete red herring. The current ECS (temperature increase for a doubling of CO2 in the atmosphere) is centred around 3°C (IPCC AR6). The 2°C will destroy civilisation is simply made up.

 

 

Parents
  • 0

     

    [PBL] Have any of those core samples shown evidence of a 3° rise in 200 years or les

    [JS] Personally No, but the facts presented by Parker 1992; CO2: Boden 2016 show that warming began 200 years before man made any significant contribution of CO2 into the atmosphere. Warming being about 1.5 degrees since 1650

    I take it Parker 1992 is the Central England Temperature (CET) study, CET being as far as I know the longest recorded surface temperature series, from 1659. Various further studies from Stott seem to show that CET actually shows an anthropogenic rise since about 1950. The studies use a global-climate model to estimate the natural variability. https://rmets.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/asl.136

    This paper is open-access. Parker 1992 is not.

Reply
  • 0

     

    [PBL] Have any of those core samples shown evidence of a 3° rise in 200 years or les

    [JS] Personally No, but the facts presented by Parker 1992; CO2: Boden 2016 show that warming began 200 years before man made any significant contribution of CO2 into the atmosphere. Warming being about 1.5 degrees since 1650

    I take it Parker 1992 is the Central England Temperature (CET) study, CET being as far as I know the longest recorded surface temperature series, from 1659. Various further studies from Stott seem to show that CET actually shows an anthropogenic rise since about 1950. The studies use a global-climate model to estimate the natural variability. https://rmets.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/asl.136

    This paper is open-access. Parker 1992 is not.

Children
No Data

Community Rules & Guidelines