Rules and Guidelines
Want to participate in the discussions? Please read our Community Rules and Guidelines. Need some help? Visit Support and Answers.

  • State Not Answered
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 167 replies
  • Subscribers 14 subscribers
  • Views 10111 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
You may also be interested in
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

I hope the Climate Activists are proud of the effect their lies are having on the younger generation

Roger B

If this survey is real the messages these young people are receiving are completely wrong.

We need to reduce our impact on our planet but CO2 is a complete red herring. The current ECS (temperature increase for a doubling of CO2 in the atmosphere) is centred around 3°C (IPCC AR6). The 2°C will destroy civilisation is simply made up.

 

 

Parents
  • 0

    [PBL] Look at point 4). Apparently this gentleman doesn't read the newspapers. He wouldn't be ablt to say that in a lecture anywhere in California. Or, I imagine, many places in Louisiana. Or in the Eifel. And it passes in this supposed review also without comment. So there are at least two people not reading newspapers :-)

    [AU] With all due respect, I cannot accept grethaesque exclamations based on newspaper articles a hard evidence. 

    I mentioned inter alia the unprecendented California wildfire season and the heatdome that built itself up in July. I also mentioned that I lived there for nearly twenty years and have colleagues who still do, with whom I am in touch. Calling that “grethaesque exclamations based on newspaper articles” does suggest the type of discussion you seem comfortable with.

    For the record, I don't think such comments have a place in any rational discussion about whether global warming is real, what the evidence is, and what to do about it. 

     

Reply
  • 0

    [PBL] Look at point 4). Apparently this gentleman doesn't read the newspapers. He wouldn't be ablt to say that in a lecture anywhere in California. Or, I imagine, many places in Louisiana. Or in the Eifel. And it passes in this supposed review also without comment. So there are at least two people not reading newspapers :-)

    [AU] With all due respect, I cannot accept grethaesque exclamations based on newspaper articles a hard evidence. 

    I mentioned inter alia the unprecendented California wildfire season and the heatdome that built itself up in July. I also mentioned that I lived there for nearly twenty years and have colleagues who still do, with whom I am in touch. Calling that “grethaesque exclamations based on newspaper articles” does suggest the type of discussion you seem comfortable with.

    For the record, I don't think such comments have a place in any rational discussion about whether global warming is real, what the evidence is, and what to do about it. 

     

Children
No Data

Community Rules & Guidelines