Rules and Guidelines
Want to participate in the discussions? Please read our Community Rules and Guidelines. Need some help? Visit Support and Answers.

  • State Not Answered
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 167 replies
  • Subscribers 14 subscribers
  • Views 10114 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
You may also be interested in
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

I hope the Climate Activists are proud of the effect their lies are having on the younger generation

Roger B

If this survey is real the messages these young people are receiving are completely wrong.

We need to reduce our impact on our planet but CO2 is a complete red herring. The current ECS (temperature increase for a doubling of CO2 in the atmosphere) is centred around 3°C (IPCC AR6). The 2°C will destroy civilisation is simply made up.

 

 

Parents
  • 0

    Peter Bernard Ladkin: 
     

    dcbwhaley: 
     

    We really did ought to wait until we are 100% sure - OK 99.9% - that mankind is causing climate change….

    Um, we are very much 100% certain. The (technical part of the) discussion here has been about the extent of anthropogenic effects, not whether there are any.

    Besides, this kind of thinking is no longer generally considered appropriate in this context . Health, medicine, engineering safety, and now parts of climate science have been based for a long time on the notion of risk. 

    Um. I disagree.

    Roger has given you enough facts and figures to totally discredit your thinking.

Reply
  • 0

    Peter Bernard Ladkin: 
     

    dcbwhaley: 
     

    We really did ought to wait until we are 100% sure - OK 99.9% - that mankind is causing climate change….

    Um, we are very much 100% certain. The (technical part of the) discussion here has been about the extent of anthropogenic effects, not whether there are any.

    Besides, this kind of thinking is no longer generally considered appropriate in this context . Health, medicine, engineering safety, and now parts of climate science have been based for a long time on the notion of risk. 

    Um. I disagree.

    Roger has given you enough facts and figures to totally discredit your thinking.

Children
No Data

Community Rules & Guidelines