I hope the Climate Activists are proud of the effect their lies are having on the younger generation

Roger Bryant:
So what can we do? I tend to agree with Mike that to add some base load nuclear and reinforce the distribution network would be a good start.

First of all, I am convinced that we should do what you have been doing - keeping the unsettled climate science in public focus to educate the open-minded, certainly only until scientific evidence invalidating the course advised by the IPCC would fade and a true consensus emerges. As we have seen in this thread, true believers in CAGW and in the need for climate neutrality will dodge any uncomfortable questions and stand their ground with righteous determination of the knights who said "Ni!" (until they didn't) ?

I agree about the need for re-introduction of nuclear power, based on improved technologies; several types of modular reactors are under development. The idea of getting the power from sunlight is excellent but we cannot live without a stable grid, particularly in the Nordic countries.

Trench warfare between climate scientists will probably continue for quite some time; the general public is typically unaware of non-CAGW theories that explain mild warming, and of refutations of certain alarmist research papers. I doubt whether even a cooling period that may have started already would bring significant changes to climate policies in a time scale shorter than 5 to 10 years - too many stakeholders have invested too much of themselves into battling CAGW...

Roger Bryant:
So what can we do? I tend to agree with Mike that to add some base load nuclear and reinforce the distribution network would be a good start.

First of all, I am convinced that we should do what you have been doing - keeping the unsettled climate science in public focus to educate the open-minded, certainly only until scientific evidence invalidating the course advised by the IPCC would fade and a true consensus emerges. As we have seen in this thread, true believers in CAGW and in the need for climate neutrality will dodge any uncomfortable questions and stand their ground with righteous determination of the knights who said "Ni!" (until they didn't) ?

I agree about the need for re-introduction of nuclear power, based on improved technologies; several types of modular reactors are under development. The idea of getting the power from sunlight is excellent but we cannot live without a stable grid, particularly in the Nordic countries.

Trench warfare between climate scientists will probably continue for quite some time; the general public is typically unaware of non-CAGW theories that explain mild warming, and of refutations of certain alarmist research papers. I doubt whether even a cooling period that may have started already would bring significant changes to climate policies in a time scale shorter than 5 to 10 years - too many stakeholders have invested too much of themselves into battling CAGW...