This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

I hope the Climate Activists are proud of the effect their lies are having on the younger generation

If this survey is real the messages these young people are receiving are completely wrong.

We need to reduce our impact on our planet but CO2 is a complete red herring. The current ECS (temperature increase for a doubling of CO2 in the atmosphere) is centred around 3°C (IPCC AR6). The 2°C will destroy civilisation is simply made up.

 

 

Parents
  • Aivar Usk: 

    You are certainly free to keep your opinion; I remain open for changing mine when new scientific evidence provides a cause.

    You have said repeatedly that you are unable to judge the scientific evidence.

    , I have seen too many comments from disillusioned IPCC experts claiming that the processes are biased and politically steered. 

    It goes without saying that you have no experience with such processes. 

    But it would be interesting if you would say which IPCC experts you are talking about and quote to us what they think.

    In addition, I have noticed "skeptical" climate scientists complaining that it is hard to get financial support for research

    I think all they have to do is sign on with one of the institutes you are fond of quoting, which have money for supporting such work from the fossil-fuel industry.

    And not to forget - the ClimateGate events analysis, 

    Such comments can indeed make or break your credibility in this community (even amongst those who do not think you are a bot). Most engineers and scientists can look at what information is available about this event, and quickly make up their minds.

    I know and have worked with one of the members of the Muir Russell commission. What do you think I think about “Climategate”?

    Specifically which “incorrect assertions” are you referring to? What are their refutations?

    Once again, you decline to answer.

    Indeed I am not a climate scientist; 

    Which we know, and you have used as a reason for not making assertions about climate science, and then not defending those assertions you did make.

    A reasonable person takes that as a good reason you should shut up.

     I tend to asnwer questions adn accusations. 

    Actually, you don't. You say “I'm not a climate scientist” and decline to answer questions about specific claims in climate science. 

    How not being an expert entitles you to give any opinion on who is and who is not doing good climate science is ……. an interesting issue.

    I am not sure who else human is following this any longer. 

Reply
  • Aivar Usk: 

    You are certainly free to keep your opinion; I remain open for changing mine when new scientific evidence provides a cause.

    You have said repeatedly that you are unable to judge the scientific evidence.

    , I have seen too many comments from disillusioned IPCC experts claiming that the processes are biased and politically steered. 

    It goes without saying that you have no experience with such processes. 

    But it would be interesting if you would say which IPCC experts you are talking about and quote to us what they think.

    In addition, I have noticed "skeptical" climate scientists complaining that it is hard to get financial support for research

    I think all they have to do is sign on with one of the institutes you are fond of quoting, which have money for supporting such work from the fossil-fuel industry.

    And not to forget - the ClimateGate events analysis, 

    Such comments can indeed make or break your credibility in this community (even amongst those who do not think you are a bot). Most engineers and scientists can look at what information is available about this event, and quickly make up their minds.

    I know and have worked with one of the members of the Muir Russell commission. What do you think I think about “Climategate”?

    Specifically which “incorrect assertions” are you referring to? What are their refutations?

    Once again, you decline to answer.

    Indeed I am not a climate scientist; 

    Which we know, and you have used as a reason for not making assertions about climate science, and then not defending those assertions you did make.

    A reasonable person takes that as a good reason you should shut up.

     I tend to asnwer questions adn accusations. 

    Actually, you don't. You say “I'm not a climate scientist” and decline to answer questions about specific claims in climate science. 

    How not being an expert entitles you to give any opinion on who is and who is not doing good climate science is ……. an interesting issue.

    I am not sure who else human is following this any longer. 

Children
No Data