Rules and Guidelines
Want to participate in the discussions? Please read our Community Rules and Guidelines. Need some help? Visit Support and Answers.

  • State Not Answered
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 167 replies
  • Subscribers 16 subscribers
  • Views 11464 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
You may also be interested in
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

I hope the Climate Activists are proud of the effect their lies are having on the younger generation

Roger B

If this survey is real the messages these young people are receiving are completely wrong.

We need to reduce our impact on our planet but CO2 is a complete red herring. The current ECS (temperature increase for a doubling of CO2 in the atmosphere) is centred around 3°C (IPCC AR6). The 2°C will destroy civilisation is simply made up.

 

 

Parents
  • 0

    Peter,

    Once again no answers, just repeating the same stuff. Arrhenius’s work may well stand, but it is not the climate system, note ‘system’.

    If you care to read Judith Curry’s commentary on AR6 WG1 you will find many other things with varying uncertainties affect the climate system. 

    https://judithcurry.com/2021/10/06/ipcc-ar6-breaking-the-hegemony-of-global-climate-models/

    Basing climate change forecasting on simplistic CO2 based models is not very helpful and results in the ridiculous hype that the world will burn up in 30 years’ time that prompted this thread.

    ‘Furthermore, you called people such as myself and the majority of climate scientists liars, in your title to this thread. I think that is morally reprehensible. I am rather surprised you haven't been sanctioned by the IET for such comments.’

    Where have I called you and most climate scientists liars? If you read the thread I have challenged the lies and hype from climate activists which bears no resemblance to the science in the IPCC reports, for example using RPC8.5 as the norm. I have also qualified this by noting it only applies if the BBC article itself is correct.

Reply
  • 0

    Peter,

    Once again no answers, just repeating the same stuff. Arrhenius’s work may well stand, but it is not the climate system, note ‘system’.

    If you care to read Judith Curry’s commentary on AR6 WG1 you will find many other things with varying uncertainties affect the climate system. 

    https://judithcurry.com/2021/10/06/ipcc-ar6-breaking-the-hegemony-of-global-climate-models/

    Basing climate change forecasting on simplistic CO2 based models is not very helpful and results in the ridiculous hype that the world will burn up in 30 years’ time that prompted this thread.

    ‘Furthermore, you called people such as myself and the majority of climate scientists liars, in your title to this thread. I think that is morally reprehensible. I am rather surprised you haven't been sanctioned by the IET for such comments.’

    Where have I called you and most climate scientists liars? If you read the thread I have challenged the lies and hype from climate activists which bears no resemblance to the science in the IPCC reports, for example using RPC8.5 as the norm. I have also qualified this by noting it only applies if the BBC article itself is correct.

Children
No Data

Community Rules & Guidelines