Rules and Guidelines
Want to participate in the discussions? Please read our Community Rules and Guidelines. Need some help? Visit Support and Answers.

  • State Not Answered
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 167 replies
  • Subscribers 16 subscribers
  • Views 11478 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
You may also be interested in
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

I hope the Climate Activists are proud of the effect their lies are having on the younger generation

Roger B

If this survey is real the messages these young people are receiving are completely wrong.

We need to reduce our impact on our planet but CO2 is a complete red herring. The current ECS (temperature increase for a doubling of CO2 in the atmosphere) is centred around 3°C (IPCC AR6). The 2°C will destroy civilisation is simply made up.

 

 

Parents
  • 0

    I see what you mean, Andy. 

    I post a simple piece of information, and the naysayers all come out of their holes to say it's bunkum. Lots and lots of them.

    It would be nice if one of the most prominent engineering societies could run a WWW site on which it is possible to publish info about and discuss climate science, possibly the most socially important science at the moment. On which it was possible to refer to the IPCC scientific summaries, possibly the best summaries of the state of the science of any science, and well-regarded textbooks on climate science, without Twitter-like denunciations from the Heartland-Hangers-On.

    I don't want to discuss “climate science” with people who can only push URL's  and cannot actually formulate an assertion in climate science which they are prepared to argue for in any reasonable fashion.

     

Reply
  • 0

    I see what you mean, Andy. 

    I post a simple piece of information, and the naysayers all come out of their holes to say it's bunkum. Lots and lots of them.

    It would be nice if one of the most prominent engineering societies could run a WWW site on which it is possible to publish info about and discuss climate science, possibly the most socially important science at the moment. On which it was possible to refer to the IPCC scientific summaries, possibly the best summaries of the state of the science of any science, and well-regarded textbooks on climate science, without Twitter-like denunciations from the Heartland-Hangers-On.

    I don't want to discuss “climate science” with people who can only push URL's  and cannot actually formulate an assertion in climate science which they are prepared to argue for in any reasonable fashion.

     

Children
No Data

Community Rules & Guidelines