Rules and Guidelines
Want to participate in the discussions? Please read our Community Rules and Guidelines. Need some help? Visit Support and Answers.

  • State Not Answered
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 167 replies
  • Subscribers 16 subscribers
  • Views 11492 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
You may also be interested in
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

I hope the Climate Activists are proud of the effect their lies are having on the younger generation

Roger B

If this survey is real the messages these young people are receiving are completely wrong.

We need to reduce our impact on our planet but CO2 is a complete red herring. The current ECS (temperature increase for a doubling of CO2 in the atmosphere) is centred around 3°C (IPCC AR6). The 2°C will destroy civilisation is simply made up.

 

 

Parents
  • 0

    davezawadi (David Stone): 

    Peter, I mentioned the CO2 data, and as you know very well, it shows no decline at all during the last 2 years, when it is known that fossil fuel use declined by something like 25%. 

    Can you source that estimate?

    I understand you wish to have a discussion about this, and you will note that I have posted many times here and elsewhere that “electric everything” is simply not possible for many reasons, but the biggest one is that it is completely unaffordable. 

    Can you argue that, with numbers, in a convincing way?

    I am glad that your tone has changed. 

Reply
  • 0

    davezawadi (David Stone): 

    Peter, I mentioned the CO2 data, and as you know very well, it shows no decline at all during the last 2 years, when it is known that fossil fuel use declined by something like 25%. 

    Can you source that estimate?

    I understand you wish to have a discussion about this, and you will note that I have posted many times here and elsewhere that “electric everything” is simply not possible for many reasons, but the biggest one is that it is completely unaffordable. 

    Can you argue that, with numbers, in a convincing way?

    I am glad that your tone has changed. 

Children
No Data

Community Rules & Guidelines