This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

It Can Apply the Newton III/3rd Third Law on a Motor Engine as a Cycle System Device?

Can Physically apply Newton's III 3rd third law of motion, as a cycle system in a Motor Engine Device?

3rd Thermodynamic Law Applicated in a Power-Plant Device. The Reaction at From of the Action. New Torque Power. Its a simple Plus Formula of the Interaction of the Two Powers: 1/Action, + 2/Reaction = Retrodynamic. / For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction. 275L

RETRODYNAMIC Effect - Dextrogiro => vs <= Levogiro Phenomena Effect. / Rotor/RPM VS InFlow/Way. 2dn Thermodynamic Law Applicated in a Power-Plant Device. The Reaction at From of the Action. New Torque Power. Its a simple Pluse Formula of the Interaction of the Two Powers: 1/Accion, + 2/Reaction = Retrodynamic.

"Changing rotation inside a mass makes it possible to change its inertial properties. It is the equation for a jet motion without rejection of any mass.” Albert Einstein.

The formula of the Retrodinamic effect is a simple mathematical summation. What is Dextrogiro plus Levogiro, gives the result of the sum, of what is the total, which is the retrodynamic effect. But keeps doing Exponential.

The logic of creation of an inertial propulsion system is thus: Any motion is rotation ---- Rotation of a matter generates a space-time Torsion ---Torsion of space - time is described by Ricci torsion --- Ricci torsion is an inertial field-----the rest mass of any object is determined by its inertial field---- operating by fields and forces of inertia inside of mass we can create inertial propulsion system which moves according to the equation [m (t) dv/dt =-vdm/dt].

Newton's Third Law of Motion: III. For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction.

It is the sum of both (two) Forces - one to other / Are two Forces in one system.

It's like when the Star Trek Enterprise Spaceship Accelerates into the depth of space but spinning 2Two Opposites Forces (Like the Ying-Yang Concept) on a Central Axis in a Rotary Manner Way. 

http://stateoftheartnovelinflowtech.blogspot.com

https://padlet.com/gearturbine/un2slbar3s94

https://www.behance.net/gearturbina61a

  • Except that is not what Einstein actually said its it ?

    In any case this is similar to the mathematical pitfall that caught Eric Laithwaite with his ideas of levitating counter rotating gyroscopes. (long lecture but worth watching if you have time )

    Clearly if a mass is rotating it has moment of momentum, related to the energy of rotation analogously to linear momentum and kinetic energy.

    Now, whenever an attempt is made to rotate the axis of the spinning mass about any second axis, then an attempt to rotate is created  about a third axis that is not in the direction of either the original rotation or the second.

    This should be no more surprising than the combination of two linear forces  in different directions being not quite down the line of either (imagine swimming at right angles across a fast flowing river, it is no surprise to arrive slightly downstream.)

    Indeed if one resolves all motions to rotations about an axis which may be nearer or further away depending on how close to linear the motion, one can solve all gyro problems as vector problems as a triangle of forces, the sides of the triangles being along the various axes of rotation, and and length to match the moment of momentum about this axis.  So we can balance a gyro on a point or on a tight rope, as any attempt to fall is converted into precession - all the usual 'ooh and aah' stunts.

    But, and this is really important, when viewed from from far enough away all these apparently linear movements are just rotations, albeit perhaps rotatations about axes quite remote, not true linear motions.

    You cannot make linear motion out of angular momentum, so the gyroscopic antigrav machine is also impossible, in konsequenz sadly Star Trek is fantasy.

    so Was hat Einstien gesagt ?

    Well when he was writing to Ernest Mach, he of the supersonic speed studies,  it was in relation to reference frames for the motion of the universe, and  at a time he (Einstein) was still developing general relativity, and he was suggesting a distinction between the inertial mass and gravitational, and if there is reference point about which any given system moves. This is something that is really the rather poorly defined Machs Priciple in his 1883 text "Kritik an der Newtonschen Mechanik" It is a fairly heavy read, and of course in German.

    In summary,  be careful, there is a lot of pseudo-science babble about rotational motion, as when you have very fast rotations and quasi-statically slow ones, what is observed  can appear counter intuitive.

    Mike