The spectrum of anti-matter. Where is the evidence that the hydrogen emits dark absorption lines?

Scientists at giant collider and Tokamak installations are checking their records to identify the hydrogen plasma emission line frequencies spectrums to see if they are bright or dark.

  If spectrum lines are dark then that would mean that the sun our star is made of anti matter which will lead to huge electro-static voltages across space and explain the dark energy repelling force that is expanding our universe.

Similarly the sun our star can shine spinning magnoflux current in the form of electro-magnetic light to our planet through the dark matter force inside the solar wind.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Parents
  • If spectrum lines are dark then that would mean that the sun our star is made of anti matter which will lead to huge electro-static voltages across space and explain the dark energy repelling force that is expanding our universe.

    No. Dark lines in the spectrum indicate absorption - atoms of hydrogen (or any other atoms for that matter)  in their cold and unexcited state absorb more photons than they emit at any of the spectral frequencies that correspond to inter-orbital energy shifts. Only when excited (hot, ionized by another mechanism) do they emit more light than they absorb. That is what lasers are so fiddly to set up.

    Actually dark lines in an otherwise wide-band black body spectrum are a standard way to detect gas clouds between us and any star or similar thermal source we can observe.  There are very good reasons to assume that the sun us not made of anti-matter. The simplest to understand being the material that arrives in our atmosphere after a coronal mass ejection. (a sort of solar burp if you will) The direction and bend radii with which charged things curve in the magnetic field around the sun is another humdinger of a big clue. (and indeed our magnetic field when they reach earth) In general the massive bits are positively charged, as they are here on earth.

    The rest of your post is simply incomprehensible. The light from the sun is perfectly well modeled as photons with all the normal frequency, wavelength and coherence properties as fully explained by J. Clerk Maxwell 's equations modified by 1920s quantum theory. There is no need to involve anything more obtuse to explain it fully.

    Mike.

  • The existing theory by Maxwell show equations without mentioning x,y & z axis thus I am left with the impression that all EM forces are at right angles but not 3 dimensional.  This is confusing as we know that energy can heat 3D matter or anti-matter by increasing the speed of the charged particles.

    Another clue is for 40 years we have being experimenting with nuclear fusion in tokomaks but without success because just as the fusion starts anti-matter charges appear which annihilate the walls which are of course made of electron enclosed matter.

  •  ????

    Maxwells equations are 3 dimensional  how more 3D do you want to be than nabla ? 

    The common E-H form is thus

    So from the top left

    1) we think there are no magnetic monopoles, and if that is true, no divergance of B

    (if there were the zero would become magnetic monopole density instead)

    (the Nabla dot B is in effect dB/dX+ dB/dy +dB/dz)

    top right

    2) Divergence of E fields from any point is proportional to charge density  at that point.

    bottom left. (electric monopoles are just charges..)

    3) The generator rule

    A loop around a changing current gets an voltage per unit length

    The Nabla cross is  also a vector quantity but representing the degree to which circulation occurs about each axis.

    4) the motor rule plus resistive loss.

    A loop of B field minus the rate of change of the voltage gradient, is the current density.

    3 and 4 together allow you to design transformers.

    However there is no magic about choosing any one particular co-ordinate frame or another as the answers are equivalent so you may as well put at least one of your fields or perhaps the direction of motion along one axis, but the others you may not be able to, depending on the system you are analysing. Not all fields are free space and at right angles to each other, generally just in exams.

    This is standard text book stuff, and if you do not have that visualised correctly, you probably need to check the rest of your conclusions as well.

    Mike.

    Mike.

Reply
  •  ????

    Maxwells equations are 3 dimensional  how more 3D do you want to be than nabla ? 

    The common E-H form is thus

    So from the top left

    1) we think there are no magnetic monopoles, and if that is true, no divergance of B

    (if there were the zero would become magnetic monopole density instead)

    (the Nabla dot B is in effect dB/dX+ dB/dy +dB/dz)

    top right

    2) Divergence of E fields from any point is proportional to charge density  at that point.

    bottom left. (electric monopoles are just charges..)

    3) The generator rule

    A loop around a changing current gets an voltage per unit length

    The Nabla cross is  also a vector quantity but representing the degree to which circulation occurs about each axis.

    4) the motor rule plus resistive loss.

    A loop of B field minus the rate of change of the voltage gradient, is the current density.

    3 and 4 together allow you to design transformers.

    However there is no magic about choosing any one particular co-ordinate frame or another as the answers are equivalent so you may as well put at least one of your fields or perhaps the direction of motion along one axis, but the others you may not be able to, depending on the system you are analysing. Not all fields are free space and at right angles to each other, generally just in exams.

    This is standard text book stuff, and if you do not have that visualised correctly, you probably need to check the rest of your conclusions as well.

    Mike.

    Mike.

Children
No Data