This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Should the IET be employing investigative journalists?

So I am wondering how many of you caught the recent E&T magazine (August 2022) - Exposed: The national wiring scandal putting lives at risk | E&T Magazine (theiet.org)

When I read it it came across really quite aggressive IMHO towards both the NICEIC and NAPIT.  Citing unnamed sources and publishing hearsay and rumour as fact.  

Shouldn't we look towards the IET as 'politically' neutral on this type of thing?  Is any organisation really in a position to be throwing stones at others?  We have come so far in bringing the trade together with industry at its most promising, I think in terms of all trying to pull together for the greater good than I have seen in my 24 years within it.  

The many 'boots on the ground' electricians I have seen have suggested this piece was really quite out of order and tantamount to a 'hit piece' on the CPSs.  These are the same electricians the IET are trying to encourage into professional registration.  I wonder if this is the best way to do that.  

A little tip - If the IET want more professionally registered electricians then give them something in return.  It is not good enough to simply say letters after your name and increased earning potential.  How many boots on the ground sparks will impress Ms Miggins with an email with MIET EngTech after their name?  Ms Miggins could not care less, she just wants the work done at a reasonable cost.  Most sparks don't even like buying a new copy of BS 7671 every three years so good luck with Electricians' EngTech.  Maybe if the book was free or heavily discounted to members they might have some more truck with it????  Just a though!

Anyway we then go on to the fact that this piece was written by an investigative journalist.  So the IET can use membership money to employ an investigative journalist but cannot offer free books to members? 

I would love to hear what others think.  Maybe it is me that has read this all wrong.

Open to honest and respectful debate on the subject.

Parents
  • Should the IET rag do its own research, yes ! Actually I wish the IET was more pro-active generally - its one of the reasons I do not belong !

    Is this article the pinnacle of what could be done, maybe not. Personally  I'd prefer a more referenced approach with rather more figues about accidents, numbers of inspections performed and what trends are in fires and electrocutions as the main discussion rather  than interview notes. But that is my style and I do not have the time to do it properly, so I cannot be too critical of others. In any case there is no doubt that the stats show reasonably clearly that regulation and the CP schemes are not really working as originally intended.

    The next (and bigger) question then is what are we paying for, and if the answer is we are paying over the odds for not a lot, then if we are to be honest with ourselves, we should also be asking do we need regulation of that style at all. I bet you they would never publish anything quite that controversial though ;- )

    Mike.

    PS the author, Conor did actually ask for comments on this same topic on this very forum earlier this year

     RE: Exposed: Cash for logos and drive by inspections 

Reply
  • Should the IET rag do its own research, yes ! Actually I wish the IET was more pro-active generally - its one of the reasons I do not belong !

    Is this article the pinnacle of what could be done, maybe not. Personally  I'd prefer a more referenced approach with rather more figues about accidents, numbers of inspections performed and what trends are in fires and electrocutions as the main discussion rather  than interview notes. But that is my style and I do not have the time to do it properly, so I cannot be too critical of others. In any case there is no doubt that the stats show reasonably clearly that regulation and the CP schemes are not really working as originally intended.

    The next (and bigger) question then is what are we paying for, and if the answer is we are paying over the odds for not a lot, then if we are to be honest with ourselves, we should also be asking do we need regulation of that style at all. I bet you they would never publish anything quite that controversial though ;- )

    Mike.

    PS the author, Conor did actually ask for comments on this same topic on this very forum earlier this year

     RE: Exposed: Cash for logos and drive by inspections 

Children
No Data