This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

How to calculate ampacity of 3 phase 4 wire singles installed as quads spaced 2De not trefoils?

Designing data center installations involving multiple transformers and generators. 

IEC60364 and BS7671 give ampacities for multiple trefoils but not quads

IMO, quads must have a lower ampacity than that given for trefoils spaced 2De on cable ladders

I note multicore 3 core and 4 core (and 5 core including earth) have the same ampacity

For singles, ONLY 3 cables are listed as trefoils with no mention of quads

What is the recommended solution for unbalanced parallel 3 phase 4 wire circuits with 100% neutral and smaller earths.

For example 6(4*240)/3*120G XLPE on cable ladder at 40C ambient

Parents
  • Be very aware that the current ratings in the appendices to the regs are not an exhaustive set, and they include a number of assumptions that are quite sweeping in their effect - for example in most cases cables routed vertically and horizontally may have the same rating-  clearly a moments thought about convection shows that cannot be right. In the same way cables heated by the rising hot air from cables below should have a lower rating than the same size cable at the bottom of the stack. aAlso if there is a ceiling or a solid shelf above the top of the ladder. that will restrict the free passage of the hot air.

    If your PF is 90-95% then your loads are substantially resistor-like and when all 3 phases are equally loaded the neutral will be cold. When they are not equally loaded, at least the one of the phases will be running colder. So your quads will always behave more or less like a trefoil with a freeloader alongside.

    How are you arranging your bundles in the vertical/ horizontal -  A 3 wide stack 2 high will cool better than a 2 wide stack 3 high, for example.

    Do you have a copy of the old ERA tables? (vol  5 I think, but I will check, is the one closest to what you describe) They have some design rules that may be helpful

    Are your cables AWA and if yes,  how are you terminating the armour - there will be armour currents, and these can add a few percent to the ratings - not serious usually, but if you are right on the edge of a jump to the next size up it is worth looking at tricks to reduce that.

    BS7671 ignores that and tells you for XPLE  96% or 93 % of 625amps per phase depending on the stack-up.

    Mike.

Reply
  • Be very aware that the current ratings in the appendices to the regs are not an exhaustive set, and they include a number of assumptions that are quite sweeping in their effect - for example in most cases cables routed vertically and horizontally may have the same rating-  clearly a moments thought about convection shows that cannot be right. In the same way cables heated by the rising hot air from cables below should have a lower rating than the same size cable at the bottom of the stack. aAlso if there is a ceiling or a solid shelf above the top of the ladder. that will restrict the free passage of the hot air.

    If your PF is 90-95% then your loads are substantially resistor-like and when all 3 phases are equally loaded the neutral will be cold. When they are not equally loaded, at least the one of the phases will be running colder. So your quads will always behave more or less like a trefoil with a freeloader alongside.

    How are you arranging your bundles in the vertical/ horizontal -  A 3 wide stack 2 high will cool better than a 2 wide stack 3 high, for example.

    Do you have a copy of the old ERA tables? (vol  5 I think, but I will check, is the one closest to what you describe) They have some design rules that may be helpful

    Are your cables AWA and if yes,  how are you terminating the armour - there will be armour currents, and these can add a few percent to the ratings - not serious usually, but if you are right on the edge of a jump to the next size up it is worth looking at tricks to reduce that.

    BS7671 ignores that and tells you for XPLE  96% or 93 % of 625amps per phase depending on the stack-up.

    Mike.

Children
No Data