This discussion is locked.
You cannot post a reply to this discussion. If you have a question start a new discussion

What does the IET think of rising levels of electricity theft?

It's now common knowledge that electricity thefts have risen rapidly over the past year or so in the wake of skyrocketing utility bills.

The maximum penalty for electricity theft is 5 years in prison, but considering the Don't Pay campaign has over 250,000 signatures, then if every person who signed up decided to steal electricity then there simply isn't the prison capacity in Britain for even half of them simultaneously.

Campaigns like Stay Energy Safe (a division of Crime Stoppers) and stupid scaremongering articles in the local rag are totally ineffective. Any PR by the police will only increase public grievance towards utility companies.

Utility companies threatening bill defaulters with prepayment meters is counterproductive. Do they even have enough prepayment meters and technicians to install them if over 250,000 refuse to pay their bills simultaneously? Take into account that forced entry into a property to change the electric meter is a dangerous game and meter technicians could easily become targets for violence. If prepayment meters are installed then it's not too difficult for customers to remove them and change them back to standard meters - you can buy electric meters on eBay for £20.

What does the IET think about this? Are the majority of people who choose to fiddle or bypass meters desperate or are they just plain dishonest?

Parents
  • The prepayment electric and gas meters were physically removed from a local house a few weeks ago by a smartly dressed man, who was defintely not from a utility company. They were replaced by standard meters.

    By 'standard meters' do you mean the type that supply companies (or their agents) are fitting as standard now? - i.e. smart meters? If so these have pre-payment ability built-in by design which needs only to be enabled remotely by the supplier. So it might be what you observe is nothing more than a usual upgrade to a smart meter. The bloke in the van not bearing the same brand as the supplier isn't at all unusual - very many suppliers sub-contract the metering to agent companies - I've had folks from MeterPlus and now an outfit called LowriBeck - which bear no resemblance whatsoever to my actual supplier.

       - Andy.

  • I mean ordinary meters of a type commonly used by utility companies. Not smart meters. No prepay facility.

    They can easily be obtained on the open market.

    It looks like an unofficial swap out to me.

Reply
  • I mean ordinary meters of a type commonly used by utility companies. Not smart meters. No prepay facility.

    They can easily be obtained on the open market.

    It looks like an unofficial swap out to me.

Children
  • It looks like unlawful abstraction to me.

    I assume that once a pre-payment (only) meter has been installed, the supplier no longer takes meter readings. Therefore they might continue to supply in ignorance of the situation.

    Surely it cannot be that simple!

  • To the best of my knowledge, utility companies do not take readings of prepayment meters or request that the resident submits readings. They have a record of the person who the meter is registered to but they could be a previous (or even fictitious) resident.

    Do utility companies look out for prepayment meter cards that aren't being topped up, then send somebody round to investigate?

  • Do utility companies look out for prepayment meter cards that aren't being topped up, then send somebody round to investigate?

    At one point in my working life, my employer provided me with accommodation with a pre-payment meter. I had a sort of stick - think USB stick, but a different shape. AFAIK, anybody's stick could have been used to top up. By contrast, when I was on leave, the leccy ran out once or twice. The supply simply stopped. Fish fingers in a freezer which has been off for a week or two are not pleasant!