Rules and Guidelines
Want to participate in the discussions? Please read our Community Rules and Guidelines. Need some help? Visit Support and Answers.

  • Replies 6 replies
  • Subscribers 13 subscribers
  • Views 891 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
You may also be interested in

Free Leadership Evaluation Anyone? (in the name of research)

Daniel Rice

To my membership colleagues I ask for a small favour :)

I am completing the final Research Project for my MBA with QMUL in London, and would appreciate some support to further my research.
The purpose of the study is to understand whether there is a relationship between emotional drivers and leadership performance within engineering and technically focused professions. 

All data collection is anonymous, and the study closes this week.
You will have the chance to opt-in to receiving a full breakdown and analysis of your responses if you wish, so if you’ve never had a leadership evaluation or similar assessment this is a chance to have one for free.

Below is the link to the research ethics statement and joining instructions. Please read this carefully as acceptance of its terms and approaches are mandatory to be part of this study, and I cannot process any of your data without this.

https://tinyurl.com/BSKLTY

If you can spare approximately 20-30 minutes to assist me in my research it would be deeply appreciated.

The survey link is below, many thanks again for your support.

https://tinyurl.com/pkyrp



Many thanks
Dan

#leadership #project #mba #engineers #research

Parents

  • It could have done without the awkward questions expressed as negatives ("I don't..." type questions).  It's too easy to give the opposite of the intended answer.

    And there were a lot of questions that were not applicable to me, for which "not at all" was the only appropriate answer, but it may horribly skew the results.  In particular. all to often it was impossible to distinguish when answering a question between "a bad leader" and "not a leader".

Reply

  • It could have done without the awkward questions expressed as negatives ("I don't..." type questions).  It's too easy to give the opposite of the intended answer.

    And there were a lot of questions that were not applicable to me, for which "not at all" was the only appropriate answer, but it may horribly skew the results.  In particular. all to often it was impossible to distinguish when answering a question between "a bad leader" and "not a leader".

Children
  • in reply to Simon Barker

    Also I felt that there were probably many differences between the answers that were how I would like to think I behaved, and how my teams would actually say I behaved! I think to be really valid it would need to involve (anonymously) responses from the "leaders" teams as well. But hopefully the OP already knows that and is including it in the "opportunities for further work" part of his report Wink

Join us to get the best from IET EngX.

Joining EngX lets you personalise your experience so you stay up to date on the topics that interest you, plus you’ll be able to make connections who are looking to collaborate, exchange ideas and more.

Join us Not now

Community Rules & Guidelines