What would it take for the UK to become a global leader in semiconductor technology?

Semiconductors have come up in the news again recently and seem to be a big focus for govt at the moment. It seems like something the IET should have a policy interest in, so we are keen to find out more.

 As a quick summary, the UK government has launched a semiconductor advisory panel and strategy having identified semiconductors as one of the top five technologies of tomorrow, and the strategy has three main strands:

  • Grow the domestic sector
  • Mitigate the risk of supply chain disruptions
  • Protect our national security

 I'm keen to hear your views on the challenges that  need to be solved in order to be world leading in this sector to help inform a policy position and identify areas to explore in more depth.

 Jayne

IET Lead Policy Officer

Parents
  • Semiconductors are a key link in the chain for Smart Electronic Systems that pervade our lives today. And it is true that without them the systems on which we depend do not work. But there are many vulnerable links in these chains, not just silicon. Economically the biggest £ numbers are associated with the systems they are part of, not the chips themselves. Chip factories (FABs) are huge mony pits running on tight margins ... a show of National chutzpah. If the UK made lots of systems then we would be vulnerable to the supply of chips ... but we don't realy make enough systems for them to be a National security issue or major economic contributor. Our national vulnerability associated with silicon is that we depend on everybody else to provide the multitudinous systems businesses and individuals want. However this approachis short sighted because it means we have no native capability snd skills to enable us to guide and advise the procurement of these systems, or to fill supply gaps when they or parts of them become scarce. Years of out-source policy from all colours of government have lead to Hollowing-Out all of (most of) our technology capabilities ... in favour of trusting them to the continued beneficence of others. And it was done in the name of financial prudence, despite the many warnings from those people who do understand how things work.

    There is no quick fix for this. Its 25-50yrs of neglecting the role of technologists in technology that has got us here, and a cure even with a fair wind, will take a generation.

    What fair wind? It will mean finding the *real* sparks and glimmers that exist in the hollow, and nurturing them! With real Love and Money! With a belief that this policy will pay-out in ~20yrs. 

    Don't tell me that Gov. doesn't work with those timescales ... that's just a description about the consequence of short-termism. The USA has Darpa, France has CEA. We used to have similar ... our forefathers (and mothers) saw the need for investing in the future. Accountants never innovate, they only ballance the books.

Reply
  • Semiconductors are a key link in the chain for Smart Electronic Systems that pervade our lives today. And it is true that without them the systems on which we depend do not work. But there are many vulnerable links in these chains, not just silicon. Economically the biggest £ numbers are associated with the systems they are part of, not the chips themselves. Chip factories (FABs) are huge mony pits running on tight margins ... a show of National chutzpah. If the UK made lots of systems then we would be vulnerable to the supply of chips ... but we don't realy make enough systems for them to be a National security issue or major economic contributor. Our national vulnerability associated with silicon is that we depend on everybody else to provide the multitudinous systems businesses and individuals want. However this approachis short sighted because it means we have no native capability snd skills to enable us to guide and advise the procurement of these systems, or to fill supply gaps when they or parts of them become scarce. Years of out-source policy from all colours of government have lead to Hollowing-Out all of (most of) our technology capabilities ... in favour of trusting them to the continued beneficence of others. And it was done in the name of financial prudence, despite the many warnings from those people who do understand how things work.

    There is no quick fix for this. Its 25-50yrs of neglecting the role of technologists in technology that has got us here, and a cure even with a fair wind, will take a generation.

    What fair wind? It will mean finding the *real* sparks and glimmers that exist in the hollow, and nurturing them! With real Love and Money! With a belief that this policy will pay-out in ~20yrs. 

    Don't tell me that Gov. doesn't work with those timescales ... that's just a description about the consequence of short-termism. The USA has Darpa, France has CEA. We used to have similar ... our forefathers (and mothers) saw the need for investing in the future. Accountants never innovate, they only ballance the books.

Children
No Data