Rules and Guidelines
Want to participate in the discussions? Please read our Community Rules and Guidelines. Need some help? Visit Support and Answers.

  • State Helpful Answer
  • +1 person also asked this people also asked this
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 2 replies
  • Subscribers 21 subscribers
  • Views 4909 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
You may also be interested in
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Is Net Zero enough?

Kathryn Bain

Is Net Zero enough, or should we be aiming for a more ambitious target to not only achieve a neutral effect but start by trying to implement changes that will try to reverse some of the environmental impacts we are experiencing?

Parents
  • +1

    I think that we should always be more ambitious. As we all well know - not all plans will bear out, so contingencies should be put in place.

    In the IPCC model pathways, they say we need to further and that negative emissions will have to contribute in order to limit global warming to 1.5 deg C. 

Reply
  • +1

    I think that we should always be more ambitious. As we all well know - not all plans will bear out, so contingencies should be put in place.

    In the IPCC model pathways, they say we need to further and that negative emissions will have to contribute in order to limit global warming to 1.5 deg C. 

Children
No Data

Community Rules & Guidelines