Arc flash PPE

I've had a read over the topics on here that sound similar or related. Most were from some time ago and none really get to what I'm aking about.

I've been down the arc flash and arc flash ppe rabbit hole on and off for several years now and never really got to grips with it and never really come to any final conculasions.

I work on ships (mostly, for now) and because I've often worked though agencies I end up on a variey of different ships with a veriety of differnt standards when it comes to procedures and equipment (ranging as far as on ship I joined not even having any Lock out/Tag out equipment).

While I understand and totally agree with the 'don't work live iunless absolutely unavoidable' Electrical Safety at Work directive etc. unfortunately there are times when it is not practicable to do this and maintenance is done when there is live conductors within the same enclosure.

Based on that, and the 'never knowing what you'll find when you arrive' scenario, is there any recomendations on arc rated ppe that would be good to carry, or if in doubt, it wouldn't be a bad start to wear this?

I know this is far from ideal, and realystically these hazards should either be designed out or an arc flash studdy carried out to know exacely what is what with a risk assessment based on known hazards to reduce the risks before PPE comes into play. On new ships nowadays (as I'm sure it is on land based installations) this is being done, but I've been on a lot of older ships that were built before this was probably even thought about. We risk assess the job before doing it, and reduce whatever we possibly can.

I'm also looking to pick up some more contracting work, at which point the provision of PPE and risk assesments/method statelments falls to me. So I want to make sure that I'm doing the best I can and not taking any unnecissary risks.

My current list of research to follow up on is:

The IET Arc Flash Risk Management paper

The European Arc Flash Safety Guide book

and the ea-guide.com website.

(Note - I hope this hasn't come across as though I take working live lightly and/or that its done or PPE is uesd as a first resort. I'd just like to have ensible conversation about this topic to help improve my safety standards in the right way)

Parents
  • There problem with unknown systems is unknown fault currents and duration ! That may sound trite, but it is key. There is a huge difference between the maximum flash you can possibly face downstream of a 13A fuse, vs a 100fuse, vs a 400A slow blow one.

    (but you can estimate - assume I2t * half the supply voltage is the energy available to create the bang, the other half of the supply voltage going in the supply internal impedance, and imagine that energy spread out over a sphere with the fault at centre - as the outer surface area of the sphere is 4.pi.r^2 you can quickly get to joules per square cm. About 5 of those on bare skin is enough for an instant painful sun-tan and much more gets you into into hospital trips and by about ten times that on large areas of the body means effects you don't recover from.)This sets a safe distance of closest approach for bare skin.

    There are also non-flash arc effects, like being basted in droplets of molten metal, that can make the scope for injury from accidents like spanner slipping between the phases suddenly far greater. Meanwhile rated light coloured cotton overalls, and certainly long sleeved tops of the right materials are so cheap that not having that would almost be reckless and already make a huge difference by reducing how much body is exposed.

    Having the mentality of deciding at the outset, this is just a goggles and gloves job, or this a  visor and gauntlets job or this is a use a pointy stick job and doing that grading as a dynamic process may help.  PPE is something you need to have the habit of selecting at the outset, not 'oh I'll go and get it if  I need it."

    The trick then maybe to get good at looking at something and deciding what the level of risk is.  Simply put the problem is one of total fault energy, as above, times a focussing factor that depends on the enclosure - you may get energy reflected off the back and sides of a box in a way that makes having your body near the open front  2 or 3 more dangerous than if the fault was dangling in free space - the effect is that the enclosure protects the  things behind and to the sides from the exposure, but does that at the expense, at least partly, by redirecting that blast of energy that would have gone that way forwards instead.

    M.

Reply
  • There problem with unknown systems is unknown fault currents and duration ! That may sound trite, but it is key. There is a huge difference between the maximum flash you can possibly face downstream of a 13A fuse, vs a 100fuse, vs a 400A slow blow one.

    (but you can estimate - assume I2t * half the supply voltage is the energy available to create the bang, the other half of the supply voltage going in the supply internal impedance, and imagine that energy spread out over a sphere with the fault at centre - as the outer surface area of the sphere is 4.pi.r^2 you can quickly get to joules per square cm. About 5 of those on bare skin is enough for an instant painful sun-tan and much more gets you into into hospital trips and by about ten times that on large areas of the body means effects you don't recover from.)This sets a safe distance of closest approach for bare skin.

    There are also non-flash arc effects, like being basted in droplets of molten metal, that can make the scope for injury from accidents like spanner slipping between the phases suddenly far greater. Meanwhile rated light coloured cotton overalls, and certainly long sleeved tops of the right materials are so cheap that not having that would almost be reckless and already make a huge difference by reducing how much body is exposed.

    Having the mentality of deciding at the outset, this is just a goggles and gloves job, or this a  visor and gauntlets job or this is a use a pointy stick job and doing that grading as a dynamic process may help.  PPE is something you need to have the habit of selecting at the outset, not 'oh I'll go and get it if  I need it."

    The trick then maybe to get good at looking at something and deciding what the level of risk is.  Simply put the problem is one of total fault energy, as above, times a focussing factor that depends on the enclosure - you may get energy reflected off the back and sides of a box in a way that makes having your body near the open front  2 or 3 more dangerous than if the fault was dangling in free space - the effect is that the enclosure protects the  things behind and to the sides from the exposure, but does that at the expense, at least partly, by redirecting that blast of energy that would have gone that way forwards instead.

    M.

Children
No Data