The IET is carrying out some important updates between 17-30 April and all of our websites will be view only. For more information, read this Announcement

The Environmental Impact of Generative AI?

I came across an interesting article on BBC News over the weekend about the latest generative AI trend that's taking social feeds by storm. I'm sure some of you may have seen it too? People are transforming themselves into pocket-sized dolls and action figures! Have any of you tried creating a doll replica of yourself? Blush Did the prompt work the first time?

While these AI creations can be entertaining, there's a significant environmental toll associated with using AI that many are unaware of. Recent stats reveal that only 16% of people are aware of the substantial water resources needed to cool the servers powering AI. For instance, estimates from the US indicate that ChatGPT consumes over one 500ml bottle of water per 100-word request. Shockingly, nearly one-third of the population mistakenly believes that crafting a 100-word email requires no water.

On a positive note, 60% of respondents would reduce their usage if they were aware of the significant energy usage required to run a request. As AI use and these trends continue to grow, more awareness is needed.

Professor  , Chair of the Sustainability and Net Zero Policy Centre, highlighted the escalating environmental and financial costs of AI adoption. He suggests that the public can take immediate steps to mitigate this impact by questioning the necessity of using these platforms and being precise with prompts to minimize errors and avoid repeated requests. Remember, generative AI tools are not search engines; they are specialized tools that should be used wisely.

We’re already aware of the benefits of recycling and conserving water by turning off taps when not in use. The next phase of consumer awareness involves being selective about the technology we use and optimizing its efficiency.

What are your thoughts on this? Have you considered the environmental impact of your AI usage? Let's discuss!

Oh yes.... and I couldn't resist..... Joy Blush

Parents
  • Recent stats reveal that only 16% of people are aware of the substantial water resources needed to cool the servers powering AI. For instance, estimates from the US indicate that ChatGPT consumes over one 500ml bottle of water per 100-word request. Shockingly, nearly one-third of the population mistakenly believes that crafting a 100-word email requires no water.

    What sort of cooling systems consume water? I've come across system that use water as a heat transfer medium, but it's part of a closed loop and doesn't draw in any new water after initial commissioning. I could believe 500ml being pumped around a loop, but I'd be astonished if anyone was taking tap water, warming it up in a data centre then just shoving it down the drain.

       - Andy.

  • this article https://eng.ox.ac.uk/case-studies/the-true-cost-of-water-guzzling-data-centres/

    suggests that evaporative cooling of the outdoor bits is a common wheeze to improve heat removal in hot climates.

    In such cases the water leaves never to be seen again.

    mike.

  • Ah, that makes sense (well sort of). Thanks for that Mike. Seems than that water usage could be traded for power usage then, or by locating data centres in cooler parts of the globe.

        - Andy.

  • Hello Mike:

    You can't really believe "In such cases the water leaves never to be seen again"

    Water has  a cycle from the land into the atmosphere and back again. 

    It may effectively leaves the specific area where the cooling takes place but can end up as rain miles way.

    Peter Brooks

    Palm Bay FL

  • Given our technical backgrounds, I'm rather hoping you are playing here !  - what I mean of course is that the cooling water used in the evaporative cooler  leaves the control of the plant operator , and to replace it, water has to be re-purified and filtered from the local water supply. Unlike the sort of closed loop thing you might see in the UK, where the liquid recycles for years and external air is blown over heat exchangers dry.
    The only time I have ever seen the evporation technique  and recognized it as such is in Brazil, so maybe its an american thing.

    I am not suggesting water leaves the ecosystem as a whole in any quantity !! . It may however re-precipitate miles away from the heat exchanger over the ocean or onto another country that does not appreciate it. ;-)

    Mike.

  • Hello Mike

    "Swamp coolers ' for houses and manufacturing facilities require a low level of humidity such as in Phoenix - "It's a dry heat", not  in locations which have 90 % humidity.

    I saw a lot of them when I lived there. 

    Here in Florida we do have dry periods of the year, where fires start in places like the Everglades

    Currently we are under  "no burn" conditions.

    Peter Brooks

    Palm Bay

Reply
  • Hello Mike

    "Swamp coolers ' for houses and manufacturing facilities require a low level of humidity such as in Phoenix - "It's a dry heat", not  in locations which have 90 % humidity.

    I saw a lot of them when I lived there. 

    Here in Florida we do have dry periods of the year, where fires start in places like the Everglades

    Currently we are under  "no burn" conditions.

    Peter Brooks

    Palm Bay

Children
  • As well as having damp air, here in the we also have concerns about warm water mists in terms of legionella & other nasty waterborne ailments - there have been serious problems with things like power station cooling towers and the water misters used in paper mills and some fabric processes to calm static electricity.  I suspect the two factors combine to make it an unpopular method here.

    I presume you call it a swamp cooler because it is damp, not because you can cool buildings in swamps with it - which I imagine would not work so well, for the damp air reason.

    Almost alien technology here I think, probably  even more so than automatic gear boxes. ;-)
    Mike.