Any thoughts/information on what happened? Was it a lack of spinning reserve?
Was it " The Portuguese operator, REN, said the outage was caused by a “rare atmospheric phenomenon”, with extreme temperature variations in Spain causing “anomalous oscillations” in very high-voltage lines."
as is written in the Guardian?
The Italien blackout from a few years ago had a definate cause in the tripping of interconnetors from Switzerland during a storm.
There's also the V/f transformer saturation limitations.
Which 'classical' frequency - power relationship were you thinking (i.e. wondering about hidden assumptions that bring frequency into the I.ac * V.ac = P.ac ?)
the classical relationship that a power shortfall leads to a drop in frequency, which can be corrected by injecting more power into the system. it's how both steam turbine governors and modern frequency-responsive battery systems work: there are smarter engineers than me out there, who can successfully integrate the old and the new
Thanks; That, for me, is the flywheel temporary energy storage of the rotating inertia.
It also shows how we can easily leap past an 'obvious' issue in discussions that can become 'untrue' when there's a technology update. We only get rotation rate drops because we were using rotation based temporary energy storage. If we aren't using rotation based energy storage we don't (automatically) get a drop in frequency.
We can also fall into the frequency-phase trap where it's unclear where we have set the reference, both locally and globally, such as : "Are we still maintaining electric synchronous clocks to the level that we used to, given most have been phased out". Locally (to a generator), we talk of both frequency changes, and phase changes, in the same discussion not realising the confusion.
We can know the destination frequency/phase before we generate, now that most lines have optic fibre incorporated (Synaptec..).
Thanks again for clarifying.
There seems to be a general agreement that to just keep adding inverted coupled equipment to a conventional grid is not going to work and will result in various stability problems.
There are certainly technical solutions available, but are they viable?
Well if you look at the GB system, NESO are procuring stability services, to provide rotating inertia and short-circuit current contribution, services which previously would have only been available from conventional generation while it was running to generate active power. These services are now being provided, typically, from synchronous condensers (i.e, conventional generators connected to rotating mass, such as flywheels) which operate without generating active power, so the stability service is now split from, and independent of, the provision of active power so you can have the stability service without running coal/gas generation, so avoiding the need to curtail renewables in order to run conventional generation for stability purposes.
There's already a number of assets providing these stability services and they have been in operation for some years now.
In parallel, there's also been a number of new frequency response type services developed to take advantage of the very fast response times of battery assets, to help manage grid frequency. I think the first one was the Enhanced Frequency Response (EFR) service some years ago, where response times were sub-1 second. There's a new suite of Dynamic services which are being introduced geared around batteries and fast responding technologies.
Going back a few years, NESO was expecting it would be able to operate the grid with 100% green energy for periods of time around 2025 onwards, presumably through a combination of these new stability and frequency services but possibly benefitting from some conventional generation (nuclear). I'm not sure about the current status of this target, but they've been putting in place the building blocks to get there.
Another Ball and Chain Historical Infrastructure problem is the British Railway loading gauge. Britain was the first and started out with the smallest. Now this places significant restrictions on what can be carried on British tracks. Could the loading gauge be enlarged? Technically yes, practically no.
Another example, closer to home, is Britain's electricity system, which itself developed in a non-standardised way with a mixture of DC systems, AC systems using a range of different frequencies, distributed at numerous different voltages. Britain was slow to standardise the electricity system, but it got there in the end, first with the standardisation of frequency at 50Hz AC as part of the development of the National Grid, which required the replacement of significant amounts of non-50Hz equipment, particularly the large 40Hz system in the North East. Then various, more localised measures, to standardise distribution to AC and to 230V over following decades.
If there's enough benefit, then eventually it happens. Or, people innovate to live with the constraints.
thanks, that's a useful expansion
being pedantic, synchronous condensers are there to control reactive power
that doesn't detract from your point about NESO procuring some big flywheels, as proposed in previous posts. I don't have the figures to hand but, at least in terms of GW connected, I think that NESO are procuring much more battery capacity than flywheels
it feels like NESO are on top of this:
a) make sure that there are enough big flywheels connected to smooth things out a bit and to preserve the classical frequency - power relationship
b) procure enough responsive generation to keep the frequency within 2% of target, to cater for credible loss of in-/out-feed
c) look to the distributors to shed load if the frequency falls below that 2% threshold, to save the wider system
that point about condensers and flywheels brings us neatly back to the original post. while the final report is yet to emerge, it looks like the issue on the Iberian Peninsula was cascade tripping on over-voltage rather than any kind of imbalance between production and consumption
being pedantic, synchronous condensers are there to control reactive power
that doesn't detract from your point about NESO procuring some big flywheels, as proposed in previous posts.
Those flywheels are synchronous condensers. The synchronous condensers had traditionally been used primarily to provide reactive power control, but because they're a spinning mass they also provide inertia and being connected to a conventional, synchronous generator they also provide short-circuit fault current contribution - with these stability services being in demand now, with the shift toward inverter-based renewable generation.
I refer you to ENTSO-E:
https://www.entsoe.eu//technopedia/techsheets/synchronous-condenser/
Example project, installing a synchronous condenser for inertia and stability purposes:
new.abb.com/.../abb-synchronous-condensers-go-live-in-liverpool-to-stabilize-the-uks-power-grid
We're about to take you to the IET registration website. Don't worry though, you'll be sent straight back to the community after completing the registration.
Continue to the IET registration site
