Vertical Farming. Sustainable Solution or an Energy Burden?

Vertical farming is often promoted as a sustainable alternative to traditional agriculture, offering efficient land use, reduced water consumption, and the potential for localised food production in urban areas. However, I read a recent news article that suggests that the environmental benefits may not be as clear-cut as once thought. A new report indicates that vertical farming could generate almost twice the CO₂ emissions of conventional field farming, largely due to the intensive energy demands of artificial lighting and climate control systems.

I’d be interested to hear thoughts from any EngX community members working in agriculture, energy systems, or sustainability.

What are your thoughts on the viability of vertical farming, and where do you see the biggest opportunities for improvement? How can we optimise energy efficiency in controlled-environment agriculture? Are there emerging technologies (such as adaptive lighting, renewable integration, or AI-driven climate systems) that could mitigate these impacts? And how do you evaluate sustainability trade-offs when designing food systems for the future?

Parents
  • Not my area of expertise (the closest I can boast is a conventional greenhouse) but I suspect it's another case of pros and cons. The biggest problem I suspect the need for artificial lighting - hence a lot of the calculations depend on how the locally available electricity is generated. I would guess that using solar panels for instance to generate electricity to generate light, will be somewhat less efficient that just putting the plants out under the sun in the first place. On the other hand the enclosed approach does give you a lot more control over the growing environment - e.g. some plants might thrive better with longer or shorter daylight hours that the location might naturally provide, and it would be much much easier to control pests and diseases and of course temperature. So I suspect it will find a niche for certain crops that do less well outside - delicate, out-of-season or more exotic things - but for the bulk of the stapes, I suspect conventional outdoor, or simple poly-tunnel/glasshouse in appropriate locations will be the winner.

      - Andy.

Reply
  • Not my area of expertise (the closest I can boast is a conventional greenhouse) but I suspect it's another case of pros and cons. The biggest problem I suspect the need for artificial lighting - hence a lot of the calculations depend on how the locally available electricity is generated. I would guess that using solar panels for instance to generate electricity to generate light, will be somewhat less efficient that just putting the plants out under the sun in the first place. On the other hand the enclosed approach does give you a lot more control over the growing environment - e.g. some plants might thrive better with longer or shorter daylight hours that the location might naturally provide, and it would be much much easier to control pests and diseases and of course temperature. So I suspect it will find a niche for certain crops that do less well outside - delicate, out-of-season or more exotic things - but for the bulk of the stapes, I suspect conventional outdoor, or simple poly-tunnel/glasshouse in appropriate locations will be the winner.

      - Andy.

Children
No Data