From Air Removal to Infection Control: Rethinking Hospital Exhaust System Design

The COVID-19 era exposed critical gaps in how we manage airborne infection risks in healthcare facilities.

Most current codes strongly emphasize indoor air quality — ventilation rates, filtration, and pressure control — yet there appears to be comparatively limited guidance on the treatment of contaminated exhaust air before it is discharged into the atmosphere.

Research indicates that microorganisms from areas such as isolation rooms, laboratories, dental suites, and decontamination spaces can survive under certain environmental conditions and, in poorly designed exhaust configurations, may pose potential exposure risks — particularly in dense urban environments.

This raises an important question:
Should hospital exhaust systems be considered a formal part of infection control strategies, rather than merely air removal systems?

Technologies such as HEPA filtration, UV disinfection, and controlled exhaust discharge design are already applied in laboratories and high-risk facilities.

Is it time for similar risk-based approaches to be incorporated into healthcare ventilation codes and standards?

I’m interested to hear from fellow HVAC engineers, infection control specialists, and code professionals:
 Point right Have you encountered projects where exhaust air treatment was required or debated?
 Point right Do you see current standards as sufficient, or is there a gap that needs to be addressed?

Parents
  • If the air being sucked out of a hospital ward is so hazardous that it needs disinfection, then what does that mean for the people inside that hospital?

  • Codes and guidelines such as ASHRAE 170, CDC, WHO, and HTM comprehensively address indoor air quality within hospital environments.

    ASHRAE, in particular, emphasizes maintaining differential pressure relationships between critical and non-critical spaces to prevent contaminated air from migrating into occupied areas and to effectively contain infections. Various pressure sensing and monitoring technologies are widely implemented to control these environments, with alarm systems to alert facility teams in case of pressure failure. This approach is routinely applied in isolation rooms, laboratories, operating theatres, and other high-risk areas.

    Additionally, HEPA filtration systems are strategically installed to further limit the spread of airborne contaminants within hospital buildings.

    In conclusion, while the quality and control of air inside healthcare facilities are thoroughly regulated and addressed by existing codes, the treatment and risk management of contaminated exhaust air discharged to the atmosphere receive comparatively limited consideration.

Reply
  • Codes and guidelines such as ASHRAE 170, CDC, WHO, and HTM comprehensively address indoor air quality within hospital environments.

    ASHRAE, in particular, emphasizes maintaining differential pressure relationships between critical and non-critical spaces to prevent contaminated air from migrating into occupied areas and to effectively contain infections. Various pressure sensing and monitoring technologies are widely implemented to control these environments, with alarm systems to alert facility teams in case of pressure failure. This approach is routinely applied in isolation rooms, laboratories, operating theatres, and other high-risk areas.

    Additionally, HEPA filtration systems are strategically installed to further limit the spread of airborne contaminants within hospital buildings.

    In conclusion, while the quality and control of air inside healthcare facilities are thoroughly regulated and addressed by existing codes, the treatment and risk management of contaminated exhaust air discharged to the atmosphere receive comparatively limited consideration.

Children
No Data