Can Smart Lighting Become a Carbon-Management Tool for Net-Zero Buildings?

Lighting is usually considered one of the easiest building systems to optimize for energy efficiency. The widespread adoption of LED technology, occupancy sensors, daylight harvesting and intelligent lighting controls has already significantly reduced lighting energy consumption.

However, I believe there is an interesting question worth exploring:

Can lighting systems go beyond energy efficiency and become an active carbon-management tool for buildings?

Most smart lighting systems respond to occupancy, daylight availability, illuminance requirements and time schedules. But what if the lighting system could also respond to the carbon intensity of the electricity being consumed?

For example, a building equipped with PV system could operate its lighting system differently depending on the availability of renewable electricity. During periods of high PV generation, the system could make greater use of available renewable energy while maintaining the required lighting levels, and during periods of low renewable generation or high grid carbon intensity, the system could automatically optimize lighting levels in areas where reductions would have minimal impact on occupants.

The objective would not be simply to reduce illuminance, but to optimize lighting levels while ensuring compliance with the applicable requirements for the space and maintaining appropriate visual comfort, safety and functionality.

This raises an interesting research question:

Could carbon-aware lighting controls contribute significantly to achieving net-zero carbon buildings, beyond the benefits already provided by LED technology and conventional lighting controls?

A further question is whether the carbon reduction achieved through intelligent lighting could be greater when the system is coordinated with other building systems such as HVAC, battery energy storage, EV charging and renewable generation.

I would be very interested to hear the views of engineers and lighting professionals:

Do you think carbon-aware lighting could become a meaningful component of future net-zero building strategies?

And are there existing projects, standards or research studies that have already investigated lighting control based on real-time grid carbon intensity or the availability of on-site renewable generation?

Parents
  • Betteridge's law of headlines: "Any headline that ends in a question mark can be answered by the word no." 

    If there's part of the building that doesn't need bright lighting, then it doesn't need bright lighting whether it's sunny outside or not. If turning down the lights means that you start exporting electricity, then for that time you are carbon-negative. Which makes up for the cloudy days when you are carbon-positive.

    If your building has windows, then you probably should do the opposite - turn the lighting down on sunny days.

    Of course, the goal may be greenwashing. Make it sound like you're being eco-friendly by turning down the lights when your solar panels are generating less.

Reply
  • Betteridge's law of headlines: "Any headline that ends in a question mark can be answered by the word no." 

    If there's part of the building that doesn't need bright lighting, then it doesn't need bright lighting whether it's sunny outside or not. If turning down the lights means that you start exporting electricity, then for that time you are carbon-negative. Which makes up for the cloudy days when you are carbon-positive.

    If your building has windows, then you probably should do the opposite - turn the lighting down on sunny days.

    Of course, the goal may be greenwashing. Make it sound like you're being eco-friendly by turning down the lights when your solar panels are generating less.

Children
  • If your building has windows, then you probably should do the opposite - turn the lighting down on sunny days.

    Just to note that the recent historical propensity for glass skyscrapers ended up requiring more carbon use in the form of air conditioning for the greenhouses that they had built. Most needed special screens to reduce the solar loading.

    It just goes to show that we also need some holistic thinking rather than the architectural fashion thinking.