The IET is carrying out some important updates between 17-30 April and all of our websites will be view only. For more information, read this Announcement
1. Has the IET done any reviews of USB charger modules from different manufacturers?
2. Are USB charger modules internally fused or is it recommended that they are connected in series with a (1A?) fuse? Fused Euro modules exist which could be installed on the same faceplate as a USB charger module.
3. Do the wiring regulations permit USB charger modules to be powered from a lighting circuit? I have thought about mounting them on the same faceplate as a light switch for the room. I am aware that the cable from the ceiling rose to the switch requires a neutral wire although some already have this.
4. Is it true that the wiring regulations do not permit mains powered Euro modules to use the same faceplate as low voltage (telephone socket, TV antenna, etc.)Euro modules?
4. Is it true that the wiring regulations do not permit mains powered Euro modules to use the same faceplate as low voltage (telephone socket, TV antenna, etc.)Euro modules?
Graham Kenyon:
Not that I'm aware of
Separation is required as necessary for electrical safety. For example, to prevent a broken Band 2 conductor connecting accidentally with a Band 1 terminal.
But a "mains in the back, ELV out of the front" solution may be OK to share with another Band 2 device, provided there are no segregation issues on the output sockets.
I'm a bit disappointed to read this. I was expecting the IET to have carried out an investigation into these USB charger modules as they are permanently wired into buildings as opposed to being a plug-in consumer product.
Electrical accessory manufacturers sell plates consisting of 13A sockets with holes for Euro modules. They are colloquially called lounge plates presumably because they are designed to be installed behind a TV and contain Euro modules for TV antenna, satellite, HDMI, audio and video, and Ethernet. Do these violate segregation rules?
Graham Kenyon:
Clearly, this one from MK could be installed on a radial or ringmain protected by a B32 or C32 (see section F of the instructions) ... if you look at the specs, it will accept 3 x 2.5 sq mm as well.
But this one from BG cannot simply be wired "in the ring" or anything other than the last device in a radial, given the terminal capacity 1 x 2.5 sq mm or 1 x 4 sq mm - even though the specs I can see don't have the info on what maximum rating protective device is recommended - I'm suspecting that the
That's an astute finding. I suspect (expect?!) that the MK module has been designed thoughtfully so that it can be included in a ring main like a 13A socket whereas the BG module is consumer grade and assumed will be installed as a spur or a radial.
It would be sensible for the next edition of the wiring regs to have a section for USB charger Euro modules.
Graham Kenyon:
Surely this is simply current-using equipment complying with relevant standards? What's the difference between a USB charging module and, say, a ceiling fan, luminaire, or wall panel heater?
I suppose that USB charger modules could be treated in a similar way to fixed in appliances that are either powered from dedicated circuits with their own MCB, or incorporated into a ring main or run as a spur from a ring main on a 13A fused outlet. I can see a vague similarity between USB charger modules and clock connectors used for mains powered clocks, alarms, etc. that must not be inadvertently disconnected.
One way to look at the question would be to think about a new building where every room has at least one USB charger socket in addition to at least one 13A socket on a ring main. How would you prefer to wire them in?
We're making some changes behind the scenes to deliver a better experience for our members and customers. Posting and interactions are paused. Thank you for your patience and see you soon!
For more information, please read this announcement