This discussion is locked.
You cannot post a reply to this discussion. If you have a question start a new discussion

18th Edition amendment one. Volt drop measurement, who is spreading the rumour we need new testers?

Who is the test equipment manufacturer and/ or importer spreading the rumour that we will need new volt drop testers?


Out of interest I have tried an internet search for volt drop testers than can be used to test UK fixed installations and drew a blank with only testers suitable for use in the USA at lower voltages coming up in the search results along with results for auto electrics.


Andy
Parents

  • How repeatable are loop test results?



    In my (limited) experience high current L-N tests are reasonably reliable and repeatable (unlike some low current "RCD-compatible" L-PE tests) - so it shouldn't be difficult to obtain reasonably plausible R1+Rn values even from an existing installation with unknown precise cable routes/lengths - from that it's just a reasonably straight-forward (if tedious) case of plugging those values and the expected load current into Ohm's law. Especially tedious if distribution circuits are involved and you have to work out the expected load from all the other circuits too (including diversity), but still each step isn't that difficult.


    Thinking about it, what's probably more useful than a different meter is a change to the software sometimes used to record/verify EICR results - plug in L-N loop impedance values for the origin, each DB and furthest point on each circuit (alongside the Zs/ZDB values) and then let the computer do the workings out. We might spot a few more bad N connections before they melt that way too.


       - Andy.
Reply

  • How repeatable are loop test results?



    In my (limited) experience high current L-N tests are reasonably reliable and repeatable (unlike some low current "RCD-compatible" L-PE tests) - so it shouldn't be difficult to obtain reasonably plausible R1+Rn values even from an existing installation with unknown precise cable routes/lengths - from that it's just a reasonably straight-forward (if tedious) case of plugging those values and the expected load current into Ohm's law. Especially tedious if distribution circuits are involved and you have to work out the expected load from all the other circuits too (including diversity), but still each step isn't that difficult.


    Thinking about it, what's probably more useful than a different meter is a change to the software sometimes used to record/verify EICR results - plug in L-N loop impedance values for the origin, each DB and furthest point on each circuit (alongside the Zs/ZDB values) and then let the computer do the workings out. We might spot a few more bad N connections before they melt that way too.


       - Andy.
Children
No Data