This discussion is locked.
You cannot post a reply to this discussion. If you have a question start a new discussion

18th question.

Former Community Member
Former Community Member
Hi all, any comments welcome on this one.
Is it still acceptable to have a socket outlet for a specific use not rcd protected under the 18th?
I fitted a single 13a socket outlet recently in a loft space for one of my regular customers, it is to supply a security camera system and the suppliers asked for a socket to be provided. It is supplied from the first floor lighting circuit which doesn't have rcd protection. (16th. ed. board) There is not the slightest chance of the socket being used to supply anything else and I would like to issue a mwc stating that the socket is only to be used for this specific purpose. If it's a major issue I could get back to the customer and arrange to fit an rcbo but I don't really think that is necessary? Thinking now about going back to change socket for an rcd protected one?
Parents
  • Which does rather beg the question 'why bother then ?'  as if you do that,  there is never a situation that needs an RCD socket or FCU, where we came in.

    I cannot see any merit in a manufacturer specifying compliance with such a standard.


    It is up there with having a forml specification for  bin bags that have an opening at both ends, like some that I once bought a very cheap roll of once from a man at a boot sale.

Reply
  • Which does rather beg the question 'why bother then ?'  as if you do that,  there is never a situation that needs an RCD socket or FCU, where we came in.

    I cannot see any merit in a manufacturer specifying compliance with such a standard.


    It is up there with having a forml specification for  bin bags that have an opening at both ends, like some that I once bought a very cheap roll of once from a man at a boot sale.

Children
No Data