This discussion is locked.
You cannot post a reply to this discussion. If you have a question start a new discussion

18th question.

Former Community Member
Former Community Member
Hi all, any comments welcome on this one.
Is it still acceptable to have a socket outlet for a specific use not rcd protected under the 18th?
I fitted a single 13a socket outlet recently in a loft space for one of my regular customers, it is to supply a security camera system and the suppliers asked for a socket to be provided. It is supplied from the first floor lighting circuit which doesn't have rcd protection. (16th. ed. board) There is not the slightest chance of the socket being used to supply anything else and I would like to issue a mwc stating that the socket is only to be used for this specific purpose. If it's a major issue I could get back to the customer and arrange to fit an rcbo but I don't really think that is necessary? Thinking now about going back to change socket for an rcd protected one?
Parents
  • Agreed, I believe there may well be an error in BS 7288, and what it says is not what was intended.


    It's quite likely that BS 7288 was intended to say something quite simple such as the products can't provide protection upstream, and in any event devices to the standard alone don't necessarily provide overcurrent protection, and must be coordinated with devices providing fault protection above a certain prospective fault current level.
Reply
  • Agreed, I believe there may well be an error in BS 7288, and what it says is not what was intended.


    It's quite likely that BS 7288 was intended to say something quite simple such as the products can't provide protection upstream, and in any event devices to the standard alone don't necessarily provide overcurrent protection, and must be coordinated with devices providing fault protection above a certain prospective fault current level.
Children
No Data