The IET is carrying out some important updates between 17-30 April and all of our websites will be view only. For more information, read this Announcement

This discussion is locked.
You cannot post a reply to this discussion. If you have a question start a new discussion

Strange test results, generator supplied installation

Former Community Member
Former Community Member
I did a bit of testing at an installation supplied by a generator and was confused by the test results. I had two testers with me: a megger loop tester and a MFT. The loop tester mainly refused to carry out the test due to the frequency being 51Hz but did give a result from a light switch of 0.9 ohms. The MFT gave a result of 20 ohms from the same light switch and similar (18 to 20 ohms) readings throughout. At the generator it gave a figure of 38.8 ohms. This doesn’t seem to make sense. I’ve done loop tests with both testers since arriving home and they seem to produce fairly similar results Could there be some feature of the way the generator operated that has led to this strange mix of results? Would the high supply frequency have an effect on the tester? HVe I done anything wrong when testing. I’d appreciate it if anyone can help.
  • How is the generator earthed?


    How is the installation earthed?



    Z.
  • Former Community Member
    0 Former Community Member
    There is a rod. 0.13ohm to earth     Of generator socket. L toN loop very similar to Zs reading.
  • If there is a CPC from the point of test to the genset, the earth rod is not affecting this result. (You need one, so good you have,  but it is not in the loop for these tests)


    You have not said anything about the genset, but the output impedance of a genset is a function of how fast you measure it, as the controller will wind up the throttle to compensate for falling volts if it can. I suspect that the two testers are being fooled in different ways, the MFT is presumably a 'no trip' design, and as such draws a very small current L-E, but modulated with a very unique pattern and looks for changes in the LE voltage that match that pattern. The genset controller, especially on an inverter genset,  may well be unable to partly keep up with that, and gives you one answer, as it is carefuly winding the voltage up and down and filling the gaps in the meter waveforms. A large genset with a regualtion time of seconds won't do this, and looks more like the mains.

    The other meter will presumably make a similar test, but with a different value of test current and over a different period, which may or may not be tripping the genset controller to respond.

    All readings will also probably depend on the current setting of the controller, so will vary a lot with what other loads are connected at that instant.

    The mains at home by comparison is essentially a zero ohm source, or at least a very nearly constant voltage, and the reading is dominated by the cables and joints en route which are not non-linear.

    Note that a real fault on a genset of any size takes the controller out of the place it can compensate for,  with a long overload the regulator winds up to max and then sulks, with a fast fault it cannot, and what happens depends on the load of the day - and it is even possible to stall some gensets,  indeed 'a friend' once had to climb into a large container alongside a big diesel engine of lorry size, with a hammer and a replacement drive pin after such an event - the pin is a deliberate weak link, so that if you do stall the windings, it spaps off and you do not break the cranksaft. Moral, something about taking care when paralleling to repect the phase sequence.

    Also note that for the same reason you cannot step a large fraction of a gensets rated load on or off suddenly without problems - the load needs to ramp slowly or come on in stages. Lighting for stages and sound systems can be especially stressfull or a genset for one big motor.

    So fault currents, and predicted PSCC from loop tests are often a long way different on small gensets. The variation gets less when the genset is well loaded, and the machines are bigger and control loops are  slower.
  • Former Community Member
    0 Former Community Member
    Thanks for taking the time to e xplain that. What do people usually put on test certs for these?

  • Personally I think it is easier to test  R1 +R2  or R2 - depends how big the genset and what is being supplied, but I like to start at the genset with an earth fault relay or RCD,and then the fact the exact source impedance is all over the place does not affect  the fact that there is always some level of ADS that will protect human life in all states, even if there is not enough oomph to take an MCB into the instant firing region at low loads. Then the MCB is only really there to catch overloads that creep up slowly.

    How big is the genset in this case - if you know it is good for X kW you can estimate its equivalent source impedance by thinking about voltage drop, or maybe just pretending pssc was at least perhaps ten times max load current.. Though some electronic regulators can be set to have a negative eqivalent resistance where the voltage rises under load, to allow compensation for cable losses.

  • ScoobyDoobyDoo:

    . . .  The loop tester mainly refused to carry out the test due to the frequency being 51Hz . . . 




    The high supply frequency is also worth a mention. Most mains powered clocks use the (usually steady) mains frequency to derive a “seconds” count to advance the display. If it really is 51Hz, then that will give you an additional 28.8 minutes a day on possibly all mains powered clocks. Is that acceptable? 


    Regards,


    Alan. 


  • ScoobyDoobyDoo:

    There is a rod. 0.13ohm to earth     Of generator socket. L toN loop very similar to Zs reading







    That seems like a too good to be true test result, how was the test carried out?


    Andy 
     

  • Former Community Member
    0 Former Community Member
    Sorry sloppy writing on a mobile phone. The ZS reading was 38 and a bit ohms and so was the live to neutral at generator socket. The earth rod is connected to the earth of the generators socket because I was able to measure continuity, 0.13 ohms. I’ve not tested the rod yet.
  • how big is the genset, and do you know what sort of control it has?
  • Former Community Member
    0 Former Community Member
    11kva. Not sure what control there is. There didn’t seem a lot to it. It is only serving a little portacabin. Socket, some lights, some 1kw heaters. Single phase.