The IET is carrying out some important updates between 17-30 April and all of our websites will be view only. For more information, read this Announcement

This discussion is locked.
You cannot post a reply to this discussion. If you have a question start a new discussion

Neutral Earth Loop Impedance Testing.

Evenin' All,

                    I am watching a film so my brain is turned off. I have just bought a lovely old 70s Clare V144 loop tester. It can test L-E loops, N-E loops, L-N impedance and earth bonding or C.P.C. resistance at high currents.


What was the perceived wisdom in carrying out a N-E loop test of old please?


Z.

  • ?


    You have not been paying attention have you?
  • erm, I have just watched "Olympus has Fallen." brain now dazed and confused. More research in old books tomorrow.


    Good night.


    Z.
  • It has slipped back to page three.


     Andy



  • L-N for volt drop and verify fuse blowing,

    and

    L-E for what nowadays we'd call ADS, but basically CPC continuity, and Zs


    to test N-E requires a small transformer with the mains primary wired L_N,  with a low voltage high current secondary, typically no more than 12V (though if it is a proper early one, it may be about 40V open circuit and 16 A short circuit current, - the  lower voltage versions were needed, and some precision was sacrificed. to work with the VOELCB. ), to inject current up the neutral and get it back down the earth.


    Nowadays, this is a test of minimal use if the other two  have passed, except for either identifying N-E faults, or estimating the distance to the substation on a TN-S system, or verifying the NE link on PME.


    In the dark ages when houses off earth were perhaps more common, an N-E test was a much safer first test, as a way of verifying  a low impedance earth, either TN-s, or later TNC-s  was actually present before proceeding to the L-E tests - as in the time before RCDs, and also before meters had an internal  microprocessor to provide an automatic 50V lock out and to limit the test duration, to perform  an L-E a test on a faulty installation could liven  up all the metal in the house to full mains voltage for as long as the button was pressed.


    EDIT, in the box  there may be an adapter or break-in connection that allows the NE test transformer to double up as a wander lead for R2, and that is where the early 13A plugs with the little access window  exposing the earth pin come in to their own, allowing what we would now call r2 to be measured without unplugging a working load. In effect with the fly lead adapters  the NE range becomes  a mains powered general purpose low resistance meter.
  • Thanks for that Mike,

                                          that is very useful information. The device does have a facility to break into the N-E and E-E part of the test circuit. There are terminals on the front panel with removable banana plugs. The instructions state that it is possible to test the resistance of a conductor (presumably earth in most cases) with a 16 Amp. 40 Volt supply. Two green leads are supplied with croc. clips on the far ends.


    I have serviced the tester and it works well. It is just so well made with 60s/70s electronics and a very heavy transformer. The thermal safety cut-outs are short lengths of 18 s.w.g. 60/40 tin/lead solder, a spare length is supplied inside the case. The innards also contain some very beefy resistors. All inside a solid wooden box.


    I could never afford Clare equipment when younger, so it is a privilege to own a piece, albeit elderly, now.


    A little chart inside the box lid cover states "Fuse ratings for compliance with I.E.E. Reg E5."


    A 60 Amp fuse required a L-E loop impedance of 1.3 Ohms max. (for a 100 Amp. M.C.B. 1.0 Ohms max.)


    A 30 Amp fuse required a L-E. loop impedance of 2.6 Ohms max. 


    Bye,


    Z.




  • I would not use that instrument on a site - it is similar to the Evershed & Vignoles ones that I had (before I took them apart for the bits inside ?).and they would now be considered to be too dangerous to use.


    Mine would inject around 25A for about 30 seconds to do a Live - Earth loop test.  This would blow faulty connections apart and raise the potential on the metal parts of the installation to around 240 volts.  So potentially lethal to any occupants in the building. 


    Regards


    Geoff Blackwell



  • GeoffBlackwell:

    I would not use that instrument on a site - it is similar to the Evershed & Vignoles ones that I had (before I took them apart for the bits inside ?).and they would now be considered to be too dangerous to use.


    Mine would inject around 25A for about 30 seconds to do a Live - Earth loop test.  This would blow faulty connections apart and raise the potential on the metal parts of the installation to around 240 volts.  So potentially lethal to any occupants in the building. 


    Regards


    Geoff Blackwell


     




    Hello Geoff,

                          the L-E test seems to be at 14 Amps for a maximum of 3 seconds according to the technical info. sheet. That should be enough to detect rusty old conduit couplers.?


    I have tried it at home and it is fun to use once I had burnt off the switch contacts corrosion. . Even my old (but newer than the Clare unit) Robin tester injected about 20 Amps for a split second for L-E loop tests I believe. You could see the lights dim sometimes.


    It will have its uses. It will certainly test the integrity of wiring and connections that demure small battery operated D.M.M.s can not do robustly.


    It will be used with care and consideration for my and others' safety.

    https://www.flickr.com/photos/ikbrunels/7232463806



    Z.

  • Friday afternoon I had a conversation with a advisor in a test equipment manufacturers’ technical department, one of his comments was that I may need to adjust the test time of my no trip loop testers from 20 seconds to 10 seconds to stop Type A RCDs tripping when testing.


    The testing regime of the tester you have is the equivalent of hitting the circuit with an electrical sledgehammer, but then that’s what Hager is saying we should do with their 30 mA Type A RCDs If you don’t achieve the required X5 test results by hitting them with 250 mA.


    Trying  it on the rusty conduit will result in arcs flying with a crack and a bang.


    Andy

  • This would blow faulty connections apart and raise the potential on the metal parts of the installation to around 240 volts.  So potentially lethal to any occupants in the building. 




    And this is why the voltage limited NE test setting is a safer way to verify rusty conduit and so on, and does have the advantage of finding an earth wire hanging by a single thread that might be missed by a modern low current tester.

    Although I would agree with Geoff, be very aware that this is a museum piece, and it's behaviour on a faulty installation may not always be safe - another example is that  those solder link fuses are not going to handle a high PSSC supply.


    By all means restore it to operation, but reserve it for a bit of fun on installations that you have already tested. Rather like driving a steam traction engine or using a wind-up gramophone, remember it's age and treat with care,