This discussion is locked.

You cannot post a reply to this discussion. If you have a question start a new discussion

Intumescent/non-combustible sleeving/ducting in timber-framed buildings.

PE magazine have run the article 'Wiring Timber-Frame Buildings' (a typical construction example shown in the attachment), which seems similar to those alluded to by ES1st (in their BP Guide 5, Fire Safety).

When installing wall fans in timber-framed buildings, one option is to use intumescent sleeving (such as shown in the attachment) for flexible ducting (but seems quite expensive at approx £60 for a standard 100mm ducting up to 500mm). Another option is use non-combustible/metal ducting (as suggested in BPG5). However, does anyone know of a supplier for such metal ducting (fire rated or proven for such use)? When I ask wholesalers and fan manufacturers, they all seem bemused (with some saying they don't think anyone bothers to use them), and as yet a google search reveals little help.

F

attachments.zip

Parents

0 Farmboy over 5 years ago

AJJewsbury:

I would have thought that by the time a room fire had become so intense that sparks or flames were being sucked into the extractor fan, the smoke alarms or fire alarms would have sounded and the fire would either have been put our with a fire extinguisher or the room door closed, area evacuated, and the fire and rescue people summoned.

Building regs seem to have other ideas - hence the requirement for certain building elements to have a 60-, 90- or 120-minute fire resistance. Sticking a plastic "chimney" right through such an element I would have thought would compromise it quite significantly. Even without the fan running the duct will likely induce a chimney effect and draw hot products of combustion through quite effectively.

- Andy.

Apparently, it's to do with whether the pipe/duct breaches a fire separating compartment, not that a hole in the wall allows a building to burn per se. If the pipe breaches, for example, a fire separating wall between two joined dwellings, or breaches a wall/service ducting within a dwelling that acts as a safe route for people to evacuate the building (e.g. from a third floor down a set of stairs and out the door), then fire rated ducting has to be used, typically by the use of intumescent material. If, however, the ventilation pipe does not breach such a wall/barrier, there is no requirement to use fire rated ducting, so basically the building can be left vulnerable to burning via the use of e.g. plastic pipe, because the main issue is about evacuating people quickly and safely, not nescessarily protecting the domestic building. Personally, I'd prefer to maintain the integrity of the fire barrier regardless of location, and it seems intumescent material rather than metal is the way to go in timber-framed buildings.

F
Cancel
Vote Up 0 Vote Down

Cancel

Reply

0 Farmboy over 5 years ago

AJJewsbury:

I would have thought that by the time a room fire had become so intense that sparks or flames were being sucked into the extractor fan, the smoke alarms or fire alarms would have sounded and the fire would either have been put our with a fire extinguisher or the room door closed, area evacuated, and the fire and rescue people summoned.

Building regs seem to have other ideas - hence the requirement for certain building elements to have a 60-, 90- or 120-minute fire resistance. Sticking a plastic "chimney" right through such an element I would have thought would compromise it quite significantly. Even without the fan running the duct will likely induce a chimney effect and draw hot products of combustion through quite effectively.

- Andy.

Apparently, it's to do with whether the pipe/duct breaches a fire separating compartment, not that a hole in the wall allows a building to burn per se. If the pipe breaches, for example, a fire separating wall between two joined dwellings, or breaches a wall/service ducting within a dwelling that acts as a safe route for people to evacuate the building (e.g. from a third floor down a set of stairs and out the door), then fire rated ducting has to be used, typically by the use of intumescent material. If, however, the ventilation pipe does not breach such a wall/barrier, there is no requirement to use fire rated ducting, so basically the building can be left vulnerable to burning via the use of e.g. plastic pipe, because the main issue is about evacuating people quickly and safely, not nescessarily protecting the domestic building. Personally, I'd prefer to maintain the integrity of the fire barrier regardless of location, and it seems intumescent material rather than metal is the way to go in timber-framed buildings.

F
Cancel
Vote Up 0 Vote Down

Cancel

Children

No Data

Intumescent/non-combustible sleeving/ducting in timber-framed buildings.

Community Rules & Guidelines