Rules and Guidelines
Want to participate in the discussions? Please read our Community Rules and Guidelines. Need some help? Visit Support and Answers.

  • State Not Answered
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 17 replies
  • Subscribers 32 subscribers
  • Views 2094 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
You may also be interested in
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Minimum Number of Circuits Competition in a Domestic Dwelling.

Zoomup
I am starting a competition for all forum members as to the least number of final circuits found supplying a domestic residential installation.


Yesterday I worked in a bungalow that has three final circuits at the consumer unit supplying the whole domestic bungalow.


1. Lighting.


2. Sockets.


3. Shower.


The lighting circuit supplied the whole building.


The sockets were supplied by a B32 M.C.B. and comprised two ring finals circuits bunched together. (Which I later separated).


The shower might have been the old cooker circuit as the bungalow had no cooker circuit. It had a gas cooker.


So who can beat that?


Z.
Parents
  • 0

    Zoomup:




    Alasdair Anderson:




    Zoomup:



    Hello Alasdair,

                           the judges seem to be a long time discussing the wind-up radio.



    The question was final circuits and the wind-up radio is only a consumer - maybe it counts as half a final circuit.....


     




    You seem to be much too bright for this class Alasdair, I think that we will put you up to Mr. Stern's class next year. Wind-up radios, consumers indeed. What ever next. And where's last week's homework? Has anybody got any sensible answers here? And just to think that I could have been a vet.


    Z.


     




    Hello Andy,

                        the most important thing about the Wylex video which you kindly linked to is this:


    Why is the dad at the beginning of the video still bottle feeding his boy? The boy is old enough to drink from a cup.


    Also, why is the lazy man's way of terminating the c.p.c.s used in the new Wylex consumer unit, I always double over the ends to ensure a good termination. If installed singly the copper conductors can be loosened with movement and be unreliable. 


    If the new devices automatically switch off, we are not really sure why. With separate devices fault finding is easier as the device often indicates the type of fault. Or do these devices have an L.E.D. flash code as to the type of fault that has caused them to turn off? Imagine getting the customer to explain this over the phone. These days if an R.C.D. trips off we can talk the customer through the initial fault finding/rectification process over the phone. This often prevents a long journey, and then when we get there the customer says: "Oh, it's alright now we found the problem....didn't Tom contact you?"


    When the price drops by 80 per cent I might be tempted.


    With single multi-protection devices, if one aspect of them fails, the whole device has to be renewed. Hardly green is it?


    Z.








     

Reply
  • 0

    Zoomup:




    Alasdair Anderson:




    Zoomup:



    Hello Alasdair,

                           the judges seem to be a long time discussing the wind-up radio.



    The question was final circuits and the wind-up radio is only a consumer - maybe it counts as half a final circuit.....


     




    You seem to be much too bright for this class Alasdair, I think that we will put you up to Mr. Stern's class next year. Wind-up radios, consumers indeed. What ever next. And where's last week's homework? Has anybody got any sensible answers here? And just to think that I could have been a vet.


    Z.


     




    Hello Andy,

                        the most important thing about the Wylex video which you kindly linked to is this:


    Why is the dad at the beginning of the video still bottle feeding his boy? The boy is old enough to drink from a cup.


    Also, why is the lazy man's way of terminating the c.p.c.s used in the new Wylex consumer unit, I always double over the ends to ensure a good termination. If installed singly the copper conductors can be loosened with movement and be unreliable. 


    If the new devices automatically switch off, we are not really sure why. With separate devices fault finding is easier as the device often indicates the type of fault. Or do these devices have an L.E.D. flash code as to the type of fault that has caused them to turn off? Imagine getting the customer to explain this over the phone. These days if an R.C.D. trips off we can talk the customer through the initial fault finding/rectification process over the phone. This often prevents a long journey, and then when we get there the customer says: "Oh, it's alright now we found the problem....didn't Tom contact you?"


    When the price drops by 80 per cent I might be tempted.


    With single multi-protection devices, if one aspect of them fails, the whole device has to be renewed. Hardly green is it?


    Z.








     

Children
No Data

Community Rules & Guidelines