This discussion is locked.
You cannot post a reply to this discussion. If you have a question start a new discussion

BS 7671 interpretation of clause 560.7.7

Within BS7671 there is the following clause:-

560.7.7 Safety circuit cables, other than metallic screened, fire-resistant cables, shall be adequately and reliably separated by distance or by barriers from other circuit cables, including other safety circuit cables.

Now I read this in two ways, the first is this is specifically talking about fire rated cables only… or

This is insinuating that unless I use a metallic screened fire-resistant cable I must provide separation by distance or by barriers including from other safety circuit cables. Does this mean a common dedicated medical IT final circuit trunking is not acceptable as each IT circuit in its own right is a safety circuit, therefore if I was to move away from fire rated cable I would need to ensure each IT circuit is installed in its own individual piece of containment (conduit) to give the correct level of separation or would a common galvanised trunking dedicated to the IT cabling be sufficient.

I appreciate no one will give me an answer to the question above, but can people let me know how they interpret this clause to see if I’m on the right lines.  

Can I ask how do you interpret this clause?

Parents

  • Within BS7671 there is the following clause:-




    560.7.7 Safety circuit cables, other than metallic screened, fire-resistant cables, shall be adequately and reliably separated by distance or by barriers from other circuit cables, including other safety circuit cables.

    Now I read this in two ways, the first is this is specifically talking about fire rated cables only… or

    This is insinuating that unless I use a metallic screened fire-resistant cable I must provide separation by distance or by barriers including from other safety circuit cables. Does this mean a common dedicated medical IT final circuit trunking is not acceptable as each IT circuit in its own right is a safety circuit, therefore if I was to move away from fire rated cable I would need to ensure each IT circuit is installed in its own individual piece of containment (conduit) to give the correct level of separation or would a common galvanised trunking dedicated to the IT cabling be sufficient.

    I appreciate no one will give me an answer to the question above, but can people let me know how they interpret this clause to see if I’m on the right lines.  

    Can I ask how do you interpret this clause?



    I think I might interpret this as an installed circuit which is used to provide safety indication or control, new or added when the others were installed, requires protection from electromagnetic interference and other forms of fault and possible damage, by the use of metallic screening or providing a suitable distance from other circuits (100mm+).


    Legh
Reply

  • Within BS7671 there is the following clause:-




    560.7.7 Safety circuit cables, other than metallic screened, fire-resistant cables, shall be adequately and reliably separated by distance or by barriers from other circuit cables, including other safety circuit cables.

    Now I read this in two ways, the first is this is specifically talking about fire rated cables only… or

    This is insinuating that unless I use a metallic screened fire-resistant cable I must provide separation by distance or by barriers including from other safety circuit cables. Does this mean a common dedicated medical IT final circuit trunking is not acceptable as each IT circuit in its own right is a safety circuit, therefore if I was to move away from fire rated cable I would need to ensure each IT circuit is installed in its own individual piece of containment (conduit) to give the correct level of separation or would a common galvanised trunking dedicated to the IT cabling be sufficient.

    I appreciate no one will give me an answer to the question above, but can people let me know how they interpret this clause to see if I’m on the right lines.  

    Can I ask how do you interpret this clause?



    I think I might interpret this as an installed circuit which is used to provide safety indication or control, new or added when the others were installed, requires protection from electromagnetic interference and other forms of fault and possible damage, by the use of metallic screening or providing a suitable distance from other circuits (100mm+).


    Legh
Children
No Data