This discussion is locked.
You cannot post a reply to this discussion. If you have a question start a new discussion

Earthing and the radio amateur

I've recently joined the IET forums. I replied to a  topic regarding amateur radio and PME on the old forum. Unfortunately I cant access the old forum anymore so I thought it would be best to start a new topic.


So. On the bench there is a transceiver with a metal case. Next to the transceiver there is a antenna tuning unit which is connected to a antenna system which is using an earth rod. Am I right in saying there is a chance of a potential difference between the two metal cases of the equipment regardless if it is a TT, TNS or TNCS?


What would be the ideal solution?  Put the shack on it's own TT supply and bond all the radio equipment back to the MET of the TT and if a earth rod is used for the antennas connect that back to the MET also?


If the TT system was not an option what would be best if the supply was a PME and you didn't want to use balanced antennas removing the use of an earth rod? 


To be honest I've never really given PME's and amateur radio much thought which in hindsight was probably a mistake. I do remember when I did my training an earth rod was recommended for the radios.


Apologies for being so random.


Stewart M0SDM
Parents
  • The problem is that the radio ham, by putting bits of wire and metal outdoors, more often than not has more than one earthing system. Maybe not if if the station is VHF/UHF only and the antennas are all yagi designs looking like an overgrown TV antenna on the roof, as these do not need an RF earth to function, but a station for HF or even more so LF, is not really complete without a decent connection to the  earth beneath the antenna.

    So given you have an earthed extraneous part to deal with, the options are somewhat restricted.


    As far as lightning is concerned, any outdoor tower or mast, if not planted directly in the ground, should be arranged so that it can flash over  to an electrode if it is more than a few hundred volts off true earth.  A simple spark gap will do. Similar precautions to protect  external feed cables before they go indoors are also advised.

    Sealed unit spark gaps with an inert gas filling are available. examples  though the breakdown voltages are a bit low for full legal power operation.

      For a direct strike, like the rest of the installation, such measures will of course be blown to smithereens, but for the far more likely induced few tens of KV from a strike within a km or so, they do greatly increase the chances of the indoor gear surviving, and of not injecting nasty voltages onto the local mains supply.

    Gas discharge tubes and spark gaps allow a short to ground to be present only when it is actually needed, being open circuit the rest of the time! Howeverby far the best precaution to protect the house end is to disconnect the radio, from both antenna and mains supply, when not in use, and to short the antennas to ground if their design allows that.


Reply
  • The problem is that the radio ham, by putting bits of wire and metal outdoors, more often than not has more than one earthing system. Maybe not if if the station is VHF/UHF only and the antennas are all yagi designs looking like an overgrown TV antenna on the roof, as these do not need an RF earth to function, but a station for HF or even more so LF, is not really complete without a decent connection to the  earth beneath the antenna.

    So given you have an earthed extraneous part to deal with, the options are somewhat restricted.


    As far as lightning is concerned, any outdoor tower or mast, if not planted directly in the ground, should be arranged so that it can flash over  to an electrode if it is more than a few hundred volts off true earth.  A simple spark gap will do. Similar precautions to protect  external feed cables before they go indoors are also advised.

    Sealed unit spark gaps with an inert gas filling are available. examples  though the breakdown voltages are a bit low for full legal power operation.

      For a direct strike, like the rest of the installation, such measures will of course be blown to smithereens, but for the far more likely induced few tens of KV from a strike within a km or so, they do greatly increase the chances of the indoor gear surviving, and of not injecting nasty voltages onto the local mains supply.

    Gas discharge tubes and spark gaps allow a short to ground to be present only when it is actually needed, being open circuit the rest of the time! Howeverby far the best precaution to protect the house end is to disconnect the radio, from both antenna and mains supply, when not in use, and to short the antennas to ground if their design allows that.


Children
No Data