Rules and Guidelines
Want to participate in the discussions? Please read our Community Rules and Guidelines. Need some help? Visit Support and Answers.

  • State Not Answered
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 2 replies
  • Subscribers 32 subscribers
  • Views 467 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
You may also be interested in
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

RCBO shared between TN-S and TT earthing systems.

justinneedham
Have come across ~ 20 year old installation where RCBO in TN-S household CU acts both as additional protection for local sockets circuit, and fault protection for a remote garage which is spurred then TT'ed. 

I can't on the face of it see any reason (other than inconvenience in event of a fault), why not. (OK, BBB.. 531.3.5.3.1). 

Parents
  • 0
    well, electrically it is OK, in the sense that both ring and garage are protected against L-CPC and L- terra-firma faults.

    I think ideally as far as the regs, you'd have a dedicated RCD for the garage, but realistically they would race.
Reply
  • 0
    well, electrically it is OK, in the sense that both ring and garage are protected against L-CPC and L- terra-firma faults.

    I think ideally as far as the regs, you'd have a dedicated RCD for the garage, but realistically they would race.
Children
No Data

Community Rules & Guidelines