Rules and Guidelines
Want to participate in the discussions? Please read our Community Rules and Guidelines. Need some help? Visit Support and Answers.

  • State Not Answered
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 13 replies
  • Subscribers 32 subscribers
  • Views 1677 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
You may also be interested in
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Buried ducts for medium voltage cables

vici
Hello everyone,


Is there any BS or IEC standard indicating typical configurations for multiple ducts buried in the ground? This is mainly in relation to medium voltage cables.


Specifically, I wondered if there was a standard giving guidance on typical arrangements used for multiple ducts to be laid in the ground (e.g ducts arrangement like 3 x 5 or 4 x 4) and backfilling material requirements (e.g. ducts surrounded by concrete or other back fill materials etc..). I am aware of all the minimum depths form the ground level, depending on the conditions (e.g. carriageways, footways, arable land etc..) but I wondered if there were also indications from BS or IEC documents for typical layouts / engineering solutions.


thank you
Parents
  • 0
    No, getting out more is overrated, I love such knowledge.


    It also makes my mind wander to other related subjects. For example, London Underground's use of -210 and +420v, giving a total between 'simultaneously accessible parts' of 630v, just below the 650 cut off you mentioned (that I'd forgotten/retconned to 1000v).. is that similarity mere chance, or a way of skirting a higher safety requirement?
Reply
  • 0
    No, getting out more is overrated, I love such knowledge.


    It also makes my mind wander to other related subjects. For example, London Underground's use of -210 and +420v, giving a total between 'simultaneously accessible parts' of 630v, just below the 650 cut off you mentioned (that I'd forgotten/retconned to 1000v).. is that similarity mere chance, or a way of skirting a higher safety requirement?
Children
No Data

Community Rules & Guidelines