Rules and Guidelines
Want to participate in the discussions? Please read our Community Rules and Guidelines. Need some help? Visit Support and Answers.

  • State Not Answered
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 9 replies
  • Subscribers 32 subscribers
  • Views 881 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
You may also be interested in
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Period inspection interval

lyledunn
I am just modifying my condition report templates. I am going to include the the requirements of 653.4 which requires an explanation to support the period determined to the next inspection. That requirement doesn’t seem to have been included in the model form in Appendix 6. Is it included in the NICEIC, NAPIT etc forms?

seems to me that is entirely reasonable to require an explanation as it would, at least for work premises, have cost as well as legal implications.
Parents
  • 0
    You can have a cable that has been chewed by vermin such as rats resulting in a live copper conductor being exposed, inspection identifies it as clearly dangerous, a code one defect.


    But it can easily pass all the required testing including insulation testing.


    Therefore inspection should always trumps testing, however testing may identify something that is not cleary visible, so should not be omitted.


    Andy Betteridge.

Reply
  • 0
    You can have a cable that has been chewed by vermin such as rats resulting in a live copper conductor being exposed, inspection identifies it as clearly dangerous, a code one defect.


    But it can easily pass all the required testing including insulation testing.


    Therefore inspection should always trumps testing, however testing may identify something that is not cleary visible, so should not be omitted.


    Andy Betteridge.

Children
No Data

Community Rules & Guidelines