Thanks guys.


You pretty much concur with my thoughts, no major hazard although not exactly how I would have achieved the same result. 


I've still not found out what the alleged deadly hazard is supposed to be as the man in question has now gone-to-ground and isn't answering his phone.


I will report back just for interests sake if I ever find out what his problem is.


I now have a different priority, a 4m gap has turned out as 3.85m during construction and the client's consultant is complaining it will affect our evacuation route (the gap is fed by a 2.5m staircase). Oh well, onwards and upwards.

Thanks guys.


You pretty much concur with my thoughts, no major hazard although not exactly how I would have achieved the same result. 


I've still not found out what the alleged deadly hazard is supposed to be as the man in question has now gone-to-ground and isn't answering his phone.


I will report back just for interests sake if I ever find out what his problem is.


I now have a different priority, a 4m gap has turned out as 3.85m during construction and the client's consultant is complaining it will affect our evacuation route (the gap is fed by a 2.5m staircase). Oh well, onwards and upwards.