Rules and Guidelines
Want to participate in the discussions? Please read our Community Rules and Guidelines. Need some help? Visit Support and Answers.

  • State Not Answered
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 3 replies
  • Subscribers 32 subscribers
  • Views 984 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
You may also be interested in
This discussion is locked.
You cannot post a reply to this discussion. If you have a question start a new discussion

Lightning Protection Systems (LPS)

Eddie Currents
Q1 - Anyone heard of Nimbus Rods used as a LPS - I believe they are commonly known as Early Streamer Emission (ESE) Lightning Protection Systems. They use a type of device known by a few names such as a lightning conductor or Franklin rod. ... An ESE system apparently provides a greater protection radius than that afforded by a passive lightning conductor. I cannot find out whether they are acceptable in the UK and cannot find a BS EN  affiliated to this type of system. 

Q2 - In an high rise apartment block - assuming there is an existing LPS which currently complies with BS 6651 and will need to to upgraded to achieve the new standard of BS EN 62305, (without going through both technical  documents with a fine tooth comb) I wondered what are the fundamental changes between both documents and if any changes exist then what we would need to consider as part of a future upgrade of any said LPS ?
Parents
  • Former Community Member
    0 Former Community Member
    I'd suggest you want to be very selective about where you use ESE - for example, you wouldn't want to use them on a facility that processes explosive materials - there would be a certain irony in attempting to attract a strike to a building that's probably better off without a strike coming anywhere near it


    Other than that, often expensive, need more maintenance, often misunderstood by Clients and their FM teams, and to some extent fall into that category of a product looking for a use rather than being an advantage over current thinking with passive systems.


    For me, they would always be a very niche solution


    Regards


    OMS


Reply
  • Former Community Member
    0 Former Community Member
    I'd suggest you want to be very selective about where you use ESE - for example, you wouldn't want to use them on a facility that processes explosive materials - there would be a certain irony in attempting to attract a strike to a building that's probably better off without a strike coming anywhere near it


    Other than that, often expensive, need more maintenance, often misunderstood by Clients and their FM teams, and to some extent fall into that category of a product looking for a use rather than being an advantage over current thinking with passive systems.


    For me, they would always be a very niche solution


    Regards


    OMS


Children
No Data

Join us to get the best from IET EngX.

Joining EngX lets you personalise your experience so you stay up to date on the topics that interest you, plus you’ll be able to make connections who are looking to collaborate, exchange ideas and more.

Join us Not now

Community Rules & Guidelines